Skip to content

Benchmark

Terminal Bench 2

A benchmark that tests AI agents on realistic terminal-based coding and system tasks, used to measure task-completion accuracy of language model agents.

Known aliases

  • TB 2.0
  • Terminal Bench 2.0

Current stories

buildOne report1 publisher

Deep Agents now swaps in apply_patch the moment you name a Codex model

LangChain's new harness profiles set prompts, tool implementations and tool names per model family. The company measures a 10 to 20 point gain on a tau2-bench subset it curated from tasks frontier models have not saturated.

Publishers:langchain.com

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption15
Hype gap+18
Incentives80
Confidence55
investOne report1 publisher

A $14.34 router matched Opus-5's score on LiteLLM's 21-task benchmark

LiteLLM's own Terminal-Bench run puts a gpt-5.4-mini classifier routing across Haiku, Sonnet and Opus at $14.34 against Opus-5's $19.74 for the same 16 solved tasks. The saving works out at 26 cents a task.

Publishers:docs.litellm.ai

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption15
Hype gap+35
Incentives80
Confidence48
buildOne report1 publisher

Cached prefixes push 91% of a ReAct agent's LLM time into decode

An arXiv tracing study of Claude Code agents on Gemma and Qwen measured prefix-cache hit rates between 84.6 and 99.5 percent, which moves the serving bottleneck to how long you can keep KV blocks resident between tool calls.

Publishers:arxiv.org

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption25
Hype gap+12
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence55