Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

ZetaChain's holders retire a $27m Layer 1 after 32 months of mainnet

Proposal 68 passed with 99.4% of a 58% turnout, so the votes against came to about 0.17% of eligible stake. ZetaChain's stated reason is the work of coordinating upstream Cosmos patches across dozens of validators.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying ZetaChain's holders retire a $27m Layer 1 after 32 months of mainnet

What happened

  • Proposal 68 closed on Sunday with 99.4% in favour on 58% participation, clearing a 40% quorum, with opposition and abstentions at 0.3% apiece, according to the project's governance portal.
  • ZETA becomes a native Solana SPL token at one-for-one, keeping its ticker, total supply and vesting schedules, while the proposal excludes ZETA held on Ethereum and BNB Chain.
  • The project raised $27 million in August 2023, with Blockchain.com and Jane Street Capital among the investors, to build a network where developers could use Bitcoin and Ethereum assets in one application.
  • Its developers now say they do not need their own chain for Anuma, the AI app launched in February that the project says has more than 300,000 users and a million requests across 35 AI models.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • exposure A ZETA staker keeps the same number of tokens under the one-for-one swap and gives up a known reward schedule; the team said it was still working out how staking and rewards would function on Solana.
  • constraint Exchange desks now control the timetable, because the vote that ends the chain waits on their swap confirmations.
  • precedent A Cosmos SDK team naming upstream patch coordination across dozens of validators as its reason to leave hands the same argument to every other app-chain weighing its own validator set.

The approval share multiplied by the turnout puts about 57.7% of eligible stake behind the proposal, and the opposed share works out to roughly 0.17% [1][2]. Around 42% of staked ZETA did not vote at all [3]. The token fell about 2.5% in the 24 hours after the result, per The Block's ZetaChain Price page [18].

The proposal argues upkeep. "As a Cosmos SDK chain, ZetaChain inherits every upstream advisory and patch, and each one has to be coordinated across dozens of independent validators," the migration proposal states [10]. It goes on: "AI tooling is making such vulnerabilities easier to find, as the August 25 patch showed, so there will be more" [11]. Cosmos Labs disclosed attacks last month on six Cosmos EVM chains, and the attackers sold the stolen funds for about $5.7 million; ZetaChain was not one of the six [12]. A researcher had reported the flaw months earlier, and testers mistakenly believed it could not be exploited on live networks, The Block reported at the time [13].

The report does not include fee revenue or treasury figures for the chain, so the case is made in engineering hours. One division the disclosed numbers do support is the raise against the life of the network, though nobody has said that was the spend rate. Mainnet was announced in January 2024 [5] and the shutdown vote closed in September 2026 [19], which is 32 months of live chain [4]. Divide the raise by that and you get about $840,000 for each month it ran [5].

Then Anuma. "What Solana's AI stack still lacks is the application layer: an app people use every day, with memory that belongs to them and travels across models, apps, and agents," the ZetaChain team wrote in its post about the vote [14]. Against that, the project's self-reported figures are more than 300,000 users and a million requests across 35 AI models since February [15], about 3.3 requests per user [6], or under half a request per user per month across seven months [7]. Holders lock ZETA for credits to spend on AI [16].

I'd expect the exchanges to set the calendar. The second proposal that fixes the snapshot and shutdown blocks will not go to a vote until they confirm swap arrangements, and ZetaChain has not given a date [7][8]. The conversion could still complete on the published terms, one-for-one into an SPL token with ticker and supply intact; the interesting term there is the exclusion of ZETA on Ethereum and BNB Chain [6]. It could also sit unfinished for months, with staking running on a chain already scheduled for retirement [9]. That view is wrong if the next proposal arrives with named exchanges, block heights and the staking design in one document.

What to watch

  • The second proposal's snapshot and shutdown block heights, and whether it names the exchanges that confirmed swap arrangements.
  • Whether the staking and rewards design for ZETA on Solana lands in the same document as the shutdown block or after it.
  • Any update to Anuma's self-reported user and request counts, which would move the requests-per-user figure.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories