Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
India's UPI fee lands on the 4% of merchant payments that carry two-thirds of the value
The regime announced on September 15 ends zero-MDR on UPI after more than six years. The rate has not been notified, and the 0.4% figure in circulation would collect about four times what the rail costs to run.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- The government announced the merchant discount rate regime for UPI transactions on Tuesday, September 15, putting a merchant fee back into a rail that had run without one since January 2020.
- Parliament's Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 amended Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act to remove the bar on charging for the prescribed electronic payment modes.
- A LocalCircles poll of more than 20,000 people found 12% would keep using UPI if a fee applied above Rs 3,000 at large merchants, and 2% if merchants recovered the fee from customers.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- cost At 0.4% the fee would collect several times the bill it is meant to cover, so the rate the government notifies decides whether this funds infrastructure upgrades or becomes a standing revenue line for banks and payment service providers.
- exposure The statutory hook keys off turnover above Rs 50 crore, so the merchants newly chargeable are the large ones, and the small-shop pass-through pattern from credit cards is not the population the amendment reaches.
- decision A large merchant weighing 0.4% on UPI against up to 0.9% on debit and 1% to 3% on credit has a cheap rail even after the fee, which changes the calculation on whether to steer customers at the counter at all.
- contradiction An advisory to banks is not a price cap, and the poll evidence puts continued UPI use at 2% if the cost reaches customers, so how the advisory is enforced determines whether the volume forecast holds.
The average UPI transaction in 2025-26 was about Rs 1,308, which is what Rs 314 lakh crore spread across more than 24,000 crore transactions comes to [5][6]. The Rs 2,000 line sits above that average. Only 4% of person-to-merchant transactions cross it, and those carry around two-thirds of the value [4].
The rate itself has not been settled. The Indian Express reports a figure of around 0.4% on high-value merchant payments and says the specifics are not clear [8]. Two-thirds of last year's Rs 314 lakh crore is roughly Rs 209 lakh crore [20], and 0.4% of that is about Rs 84,000 crore [21]. That total includes person-to-person traffic, which stays free, so the real base is smaller and Rs 84,000 crore is a ceiling [18]. It is still more than four times the Rs 20,000 crore a year that banks and payment service providers have been spending to keep the infrastructure running [9][22]. Recovering Rs 20,000 crore from that base takes about 0.10% [23]. In August the Finance Ministry said any MDR would apply only to a "limited set" of merchant transactions above a specified threshold and at a nominal rate [19].
The Standing Committee on Finance said in a March report that the "absence of MDR makes the UPI ecosystem financially unsustainable" [16]. There are 703 entities, banks and payment service providers, facilitating UPI transactions for more than 55 crore users, and they have been funding cybersecurity and capacity upgrades out of revenue earned elsewhere [17][9].
The government said it has "advised" banks to ensure merchants do not pass the additional cost to consumers [14]. An advisory leaves the decision with the merchant. The Indian Express notes that small merchants have been known to pass credit card MDR to customers [24], though the provision Parliament unlocked runs through Section 269SU, which applied to businesses with turnover above Rs 50 crore [11][10].
LocalCircles polled more than 20,000 people and found that 12% would keep using UPI if a fee were levied on payments above Rs 3,000 at large merchants, falling to 2% if merchants recovered the fee from them [15]. Stated intentions in a poll are cheap, and the substitution has to land somewhere: at a large merchant the alternatives are cash or a card, where MDR runs 1% to 3% on credit and up to 0.9% on debit [7]. A merchant paying 0.4% on UPI gains nothing by pushing a customer onto debit at 0.9%. I'd expect the volume to stay and the fee to be absorbed at the top of the merchant distribution, where the amendment reaches [13].
Two things would break that. A notified threshold at Rs 2,000 catches transactions the poll never asked about, since it tested Rs 3,000 [15]. And visible pass-through at large merchants, which the government has only advised against, would put the 2% figure to work [14].
What to watch
- The notified rate and threshold: whether the final number sits near the 0.4% reported or nearer the 0.10% that covers the stated Rs 20,000 crore cost.
- Whether any bank or payment service provider publishes a pass-through rule, given that the government has only advised against passing the cost to consumers.
- Whether RuPay debit card MDR moves at the same time, since the same Section 10A amendment covers it.