Science1 publisher2 min readPublished
DNA metabarcoding traces most of Melbourne's spring grass pollen to perennial ryegrass
Weekly air samples from two consecutive Melbourne springs were screened by metabarcoding, then quantified by qPCR. Ryegrass DNA rose and fell with the published grass pollen count, and Timothy grass never appeared at all.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- Melbourne's air monitoring can separate grass pollen from other pollen types but cannot say which grass produced it, because grass pollen grains look much alike under a microscope.
- A research team applied DNA metabarcoding to weekly air samples collected over two consecutive years to identify the plant species leaving genetic traces in Melbourne's air.
- Most of the barcodes recovered came from perennial ryegrass, with smaller contributions from velvet grass, sweet vernal grass and bent grass.
- Timothy grass, a major hay fever trigger across Europe, did not appear in the samples at all, and subtropical lawn and sports-field grasses barely registered.
- Melbourne's 2016 epidemic thunderstorm asthma event produced more than 3,500 emergency department presentations, a 672% rise in respiratory hospital admissions and 10 deaths.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- contradiction Ryegrass DNA and the total grass pollen count move together, which makes the number Melbourne already publishes close to a ryegrass index for most of spring. That leaves the strongest case for species resolution in interpreting an individual patient's exposure, and a weaker one in the public daily figure.
- constraint At one sample a week, this method cannot supply the day-level input that a thunderstorm asthma warning is issued on. For now the species data inform which taxon to model.
- decision For an allergist, knowing which grass a patient is actually exposed to bears on whether to prescribe preventive asthma medication, and a Timothy-positive test in Victoria now has air data against which to read it.
- capability Pairing a metabarcoding screen with qPCR probes on four taxa gives Melbourne a species-specific quantity it can track over a season, which microscopy alone could not deliver.
Two techniques ran in sequence because each answers a different question. Metabarcoding pulls short marker sequences out of environmental DNA and matches them against a library of known sequences, which is how you learn which species left traces in a sample [11]. It is poor at measuring how much of each [15]. So the team took the four grasses that came up most often and measured those with quantitative PCR [16]. Ryegrass DNA came out by far the most abundant [17].
Across the season, ryegrass DNA and the measured airborne grass pollen count rose and fell together. The authors take that as evidence that ryegrass is the main grass pollen in Melbourne's air for most of spring [18].
The co-movement identifies the dominant taxon, and it means the count Melbourne already publishes each day from October to December tracks ryegrass closely for most of the season [3][18]. Species labels change what that daily number can be interpreted to mean. qPCR reports DNA copies, while allergen exposure is a dose of protein, and the measurements here are of DNA [16].
Two consecutive years of weekly sampling [10] sit inside a hazard that recurs in Melbourne on average once every seven years [7], so the sampled springs were most likely ordinary ones [24]. Since 2016 the city has issued emergency thunderstorm asthma warnings on the basis of predicted grass pollen counts and the weather [19]. A weekly air sample gives at most one measurement per seven daily forecasts [26].
The clinical use is more direct. Most people with thunderstorm asthma are allergic to ryegrass pollen, and many also react to other grasses including Timothy, Bermuda and Bahia [20]. In two years of Melbourne air, Timothy DNA did not appear at all and the subtropical grasses barely registered [14][13]. A Victorian patient who tests positive to Timothy is therefore sensitised to a grass the air sampling did not find, which is a different exposure picture from a ryegrass-driven one, and the authors note evidence that the more strongly allergic a person is, the greater their asthma risk [21].
Air sampling on its own cannot supply that link, and the authors write that clinicians could treat hay fever sufferers far more reliably with a better understanding of how spring asthma symptoms relate to grass pollen exposure [23]. That is the question behind CARISTA, which is recruiting up to 600 hay fever sufferers across Victoria for allergy and lung function testing [22].
What to watch
- CARISTA results linking measured grass pollen exposure to allergy and lung function tests in up to 600 Victorians.
- Whether ryegrass qPCR is ever run at daily cadence, which is the resolution a warning forecast is issued at.
- A season in which ryegrass DNA and the total grass pollen count stop moving together, which would break the proxy.