Build1 publisher3 min readPublished
Relocating to Vietnam pays only while unit costs stay within 13% of China's
Reuters reports buyers moving orders back to Chinese suppliers after plants in India and Vietnam ran short of tooling, skilled workers and steady power. The tariff spread they moved for was about 14 points in July.
The Engineer · Build desk

What happened
- Reuters reported that companies which shifted production out of China last year to escape US tariffs are sending part of their orders back, having found China's industrial base harder to reproduce than expected.
- Plants abroad have run into shortages of skilled workers, proven suppliers, the equipment they need and stable electricity, so the lower tariff did not always produce a lower total cost.
- Target has moved some orders back to Chinese suppliers, citing supply chain disruptions and production constraints in other countries.
Compiled by The EngineerSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint An Indonesian plant has to land within 5.8% of Chinese unit cost before its duty advantage is gone, so a sourcing model that stops at tariff rates will approve projects a tooling and utilisation quote would reject.
- decision Grid reliability now enters the site decision next to the duty rate, and a cheap-tariff site with unstable power loses on availability before anyone prices the labour.
- contradiction The return is documented in named cases while India, Indonesia and Vietnam keep drawing large manufacturing investment, so this evidence does not settle which way the aggregate flow is running.
The July tariff rates decide how much cost headroom a move abroad actually buys. EIU put the effective US rate on Chinese goods at about 20%, Vietnam at 6.1%, Indonesia at 13.4% and Thailand at 4.5% [16]. Call the unit cost in China C and the Vietnamese one V. Landed cost is C x 1.20 against V x 1.061, and the two are equal when V runs 13.1% above C [22]. Thailand's rate leaves 14.8% [24]. Missing tooling, retraining, slower lines and unplanned outages all have to fit inside that.
Duty is charged on the customs value of the goods, so the comparison holds only if both factories buy the same inputs at the same price, and Jin Chaofeng's did not. The Hangzhou garden furniture exporter closed the Ho Chi Minh City workshop he opened in 2024 and moved production back to China this year [13]. He could not find the equipment he needed in Vietnam, and had basic parts including screws and coaster moulds shipped in from China [14]. Jin said that once he counted all the costs the total was not much lower, so there was no point in moving production, in mezha.net's Ukrainian rendering of the Reuters interview [15].
Power sits in the same budget. Reliability of supply now matters to manufacturers as much as the tariff rate, and energy problems have sharpened with the Middle East crisis and a jump in oil prices, according to the report [18].
The one hard cost premium on the record comes from a Polish packaging buyer. DST Pak takes 80% of its product from a factory in Shenzhen and 10% each from long-established backup plants in the United States and Europe [19]. Its head, Stanislaw Krykun, puts that alternative production at two to three times the per-unit cost [20]. Those backups are American and European, and the product is packaging; for the same multiple to describe a Vietnamese or Indian plant, the wage, tooling and volume gaps would have to be the same there. Krykun said that in any crisis Chinese manufacturing plants will be the most stable of those a buyer can use [21].
Precise data on the scale of orders returning to China is not available, and India, Indonesia and Vietnam are still drawing large investment into electronics and vehicles [8][9]. Shein is cutting some of its operations in Vietnam [12]. Dawang Metals, a metals firm in Dandong in China's northeast, lost orders when a large American customer moved them to India, then took new orders from that customer after it hit production problems there [5]. Heather Kuang, a vice president of the family-owned company, said China's advantage in supply chains is still too great and that reproducing domestic production in another country is very difficult; she did not name the customer [6][7]. Her own firm considered moving some production abroad and dropped the plan [7].
What to watch
- Any deal from the expected Trump-Xi meeting lowering barriers on specific goods would reset the July spreads these relocation cases were priced against.
- A measured figure for the volume of orders going back to China; Target has not disclosed the volumes or duration of its returned orders.
- Whether Shein's reduction in Vietnam extends to more lines, and whether Chinese manufacturers cancel their overseas investment plans or only pause them.