Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Information-processing investment overtakes US housing by $4 billion in the second quarter
The San Francisco Fed's Adam Shapiro flagged the crossover in Bureau of Economic Analysis data. The margin is about half a percent, and S&P Global expects the six biggest spenders to run negative operating cash flow through 2027.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- Real private residential fixed investment ran at $748 billion in the second quarter, 18% below its early-2021 peak, according to Bureau of Economic Analysis data.
- Inflation-adjusted spending on information processing equipment, which covers data centers and computer hardware, rose 51% over the same span to $752 billion, above the residential line.
- Adam Shapiro, a vice president at the San Francisco Fed, posted on LinkedIn that US investment is shifting away from residential and toward computers.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Monetary policy still reaches the marginal investment dollar, but through credit spreads and issuance windows rather than the 30-year mortgage, and those reprice on a much shorter clock than housing does.
- exposure On S&P's forecast the largest source of US investment growth is funded from outside operations for two years, so a closed bond market would reach GDP faster than a housing downturn.
- contradiction Bessent describes the AI borrowing as almost yield-agnostic; S&P calls the same issuance capex outrunning revenue with overcapacity at the end of it.
- precedent With 64% of voters saying they would penalize a pro-data-center candidate, siting becomes a political cost attached to the spending now carrying the growth line.
The crossing is $4 billion wide on a housing line of $748 billion, about half a percent [10]. Two moves closed it. Residential investment sits 18% below its early-2021 peak, which puts that peak near $912 billion and the drop at roughly $164 billion [11]. Information processing equipment climbed 51% over the same span from a base near $498 billion, a gain of about $254 billion [12]. Of the $418 billion that closed the gap, 61% came from the rise in equipment and 39% from the fall in housing [13].
The two big numbers in this story measure different things. S&P Global projects $870 billion of capital spending in 2026 across Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Oracle and SpaceX, and more than $1.3 trillion in 2027 against $470 billion in 2025, which is 2.8 times the 2025 figure inside two years [6][22]. The 2026 projection alone runs $118 billion above the BEA's entire information processing equipment line [21]. One is six companies' total capital expenditure, one of the six being SpaceX; the other is inflation-adjusted equipment investment for the whole US economy [6][2].
Housing investment responds to the 30-year mortgage rate, now near 7% with the 10-year Treasury yield at its highest since 2007 [14]. Shapiro noted that residential is the more rate-sensitive of the two, and that AI spending has held up even as the buyers moved from cash piles toward debt [5]. Alphabet reported negative cash flow earlier this year [15]. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said of the borrowing: "We are also seeing big corporate issuance. And a lot of that corporate issuance, I would say, is almost yield-agnostic, because the build-out for AI, the returns on that, the companies believe they're going to be so high. They don't really care what they're paying" [9].
S&P's account of the same issuance is colder. Capex is growing faster than revenue, and the build-out could leave overcapacity if demand does not arrive [7]. The firm expects operating cash flow across the six to be collectively negative in 2026 and 2027, with revenue accelerating and capex flattening in 2028 [8].
On the housing side, August starts fell 2.6% to an annualized 1.275 million, led by multifamily, and permits fell even though single-family starts rose [17]. The National Association of Home Builders reported builder sentiment at its lowest level in a year [18]. "The big picture remains that elevated and rising borrowing costs are holding developers back, supporting our view that the downward trend in housing starts has further to run," Capital Economics wrote in a recent note [19].
So the marginal dollar of US investment growth comes from a handful of capital budgets that, on S&P's own forecast, operations will not cover for two years [8]. In my view that relocates the cyclical sensitivity, because credit spreads and issuance windows reprice faster than mortgage rates feed through to starts. A 10-year yield falling back from its 2007 highs would restart housing from the bottom [14]. S&P's 2028 flattening would end the crossover from the top [8]. And $4 billion on a quarterly estimate can vanish in a revision [10]. Permitting answers to neither: in an NBC News poll, 64% of registered voters said they would be less likely to support a candidate who favors building a data center in their community [16].
What to watch
- Revisions to either BEA series: a $4 billion gap can reverse without anything changing in the real economy.
- Spreads and terms on hyperscaler bond issuance through 2026, the funding S&P says operations will not cover.
- The 10-year yield and the 30-year mortgage, since permits and multifamily starts turn before housing investment does.