Loading today’s stories
Invest4 distinct publishers3 min readUpdated
Treasury's stablecoin rule makes the listing venue liable, not just the issuer
The GENIUS Act proposal extends liability to exchanges and intermediaries, including offshore firms touching U.S. customers, and demands documented due diligence on foreign issuers.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- The Treasury Department on Monday proposed a rule establishing that only authorized issuers that follow standards outlined under the GENIUS Act may issue payment stablecoins for the U.S. market.
- The notice of proposed rulemaking would establish liability for intermediaries beyond stablecoin issuers themselves, potentially meaning platforms would need to police how and where foreign-issued stablecoins are offered and traded.
- Treasury says the proposed rules can extend to activity that occurs overseas where U.S. residents buy a stablecoin, and to entities abroad if stablecoins are marketed to United States persons.
- The proposal says intermediaries could participate in an unlawful issuance if they "convert, redeem, or repurchase" the stablecoin, or coordinate with an issuer on key steps such as soliciting customers, minting tokens or making a newly issued stablecoin available for secondary-market trading.
- Treasury says it would expect the rule to cover "a digital asset service provider making an initial listing of an unregistered payment stablecoin shortly after issuance," because such a listing could allow an unauthorized token to be widely distributed at scale.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
The Treasury Department on Monday proposed a rule providing that only authorized issuers meeting GENIUS Act standards may issue payment stablecoins for the U.S. market, and the same notice extends liability past issuers to the intermediaries that distribute them [1][2]. For any platform that lists tokens, that converts a licensing question into an operational one: the compliance file now has to exist before the listing goes live, and it has to cover foreign issuers and offshore conduct that reaches U.S. buyers [2][3][9].
The mechanics are specific about how an intermediary gets pulled in. Under the proposal, a firm could be treated as participating in an unlawful issuance if it converts, redeems or repurchases the stablecoin, or coordinates with the issuer on steps such as soliciting customers, minting tokens, or making a newly issued token available for secondary-market trading [4]. Treasury says it would expect the rule to reach a digital asset service provider making an initial listing of an unregistered payment stablecoin shortly after issuance, on the reasoning that such a listing can distribute an unauthorized token at scale [5]. There is a boundary: secondary market trading without a close temporal nexus to the initial issuance likely would not trigger the designation [6]. So the risk is concentrated in the launch window, which is exactly where listing teams move fastest.
The jurisdictional reach is drawn wide. Treasury says the rules can apply to entities abroad where stablecoins are marketed to U.S. persons, and that directly soliciting U.S. customers, advertising in the United States, or even responding positively to an unsolicited inquiry from a U.S. buyer could count as an offer or sale [3][7]. Advising potential purchasers on how to evade IP-address checks appears as one item on a non-exhaustive list of conduct that could be deemed an offer or sale [8].
For U.S. platforms listing foreign-issued tokens, the safe harbor is conditional. A provider may rely on a foreign issuer's representation that it has the technological capability and will comply with U.S. standards, but only if the platform performs reasonable due diligence on that representation [9]. Treasury concedes the underlying problem in the text: a provider "can never know with certainty" whether a foreign issuer will comply at all times in the future, and a strict reading of the statute "would effectively foreclose" offering foreign-issued stablecoins in all cases [10]. The department is proposing an offshore carve-out meant to separate genuinely foreign activity from structuring designed to dodge U.S. rules, and is taking comment on that safe harbor and on an emergency mechanism to suspend the restrictions in unusual circumstances [11][12].
The calendar is the pressure point. Comment is open for 60 days after Federal Register publication [16], while the GENIUS Act is set to take effect on Jan. 18, 2027, being 120 days after agencies finalize rules or 18 months after passage in July 2025 [14]. Cointelegraph reports that Treasury, the OCC, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board all issued proposals in 2026 but missed the July deadline to finalize, raising the prospect that the law takes effect without final guidance [15][20]. On that arithmetic, firms should not plan on a long runway between a final rule and the statutory date [19].
Watch three things: how Treasury defines "reasonable due diligence" in the final text, where it draws the temporal nexus line around a launch, and whether the offshore safe harbor survives comment in usable form [9][6][12]. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the department welcomes stakeholder input as it works to provide regulatory certainty [18].
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories