Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

Two chains hold 72% of the 4.3 million wallets now carrying tokenized stocks

BNB Chain and Robinhood Chain took 88.2% of tracked tokenized-stock volume in September to date, up from 2.3% in June. The surge coincided with a zero-maker-fee campaign on Binance and Robinhood's Stock Tokens launch, so the test comes when maker fees return.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying Two chains hold 72% of the 4.3 million wallets now carrying tokenized stocks

What happened

  • Wallets holding tokenized stocks rose from about 100,000 a year ago to 4.3 million, according to Token Terminal.
  • BNB Chain leads with 1.8 million holders, followed by Robinhood Chain at 1.3 million and Solana at 997,000.
  • Active tokenized equity was worth about $4 billion on September 9, up 314% since the start of the year.
  • Tokenized stocks drew a record 928,400 holders in August, about 73% of them on BNB Chain and Robinhood Chain.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost A zero-maker-fee campaign means Binance charged no maker fees on the flow it drew in August, so part of the volume lead was paid for out of the exchange's own revenue.
  • contradiction Token Terminal counts about 410,000 more holders than RWA.xyz on the same date, and both count addresses one person can multiply, so 43x is an upper bound on new investors.
  • exposure Token holders usually do not own the underlying stock or vote it, according to Crypto.com, so their claim depends on each issuer's legal link to the share, a risk an IMF note flags.

August's $7.9 billion of trading [6] against about $4 billion of active market value [5] means the float changed hands roughly twice in one month [1]. Divide that $4 billion by 4.3 million wallets [1] and the average address holds about $930 [2]. The two figures do not share a date: the value is from September 9 and the wallet count from September 25. Only $289.1 million, or about 7.2% of the market value, is locked in DeFi, with 65.4% of that in liquidity pools and 28.1% in lending markets [14][3].

Holders and trading have gathered on the same two chains. BNB Chain and Robinhood Chain account for 3.1 million of the 4.3 million wallets, or 72% [4], and their share of tracked volume went from 2.3% in June to 88.2% in September to date [7]. According to Cryptopolitan, the August holder spike coincided with Binance's zero-maker-fee campaign and Robinhood's introduction of Stock Tokens [9].

The growth multiples depend on which tracker sets the base. Binance Research's 314% year-to-date gain to $4 billion implies a market of about $970 million at the start of the year [5][6]. A Crypto.com study put the market at $1.7 billion in June, up 149% on the year, a figure that implies a starting point near $680 million [15][7].

If the two chains keep most of the volume after Binance's fee campaign ends, the August holders stayed and access decides the market. If monthly volume slides back toward January's $237 million [6], the incentives paid for activity the chains could not hold on to. The third outcome depends on the SEC. Its temporary, conditional Innovation Exemption, approved on September 17, permits limited trading of tokenized NMS stocks on selected on-chain venues, under volume caps, symbol limits and disclosure requirements [11]. For US-listed shares, being a selected venue would then count for more than a holder tally. Commissioner Mark Uyeda said the framework would let regulators and market players "experiment responsibly, learn, and translate old protections to new contexts" [12].

I think the evidence supports the distribution thesis for holders. It does not yet support it for trading volume that lasts. Both leaders are the chains whose growth coincided with Binance's fee campaign and Robinhood's product launch [9]. None of the data compares chains on technology, so the claim that access beats engineering rests on concentration alone. The counter-thesis is that incentives rented both the wallets and the trades, and that addresses overstate people [10]. I would be wrong if the two chains' volume share falls well below 88.2% [7] within a couple of months of the fee campaign ending, or if RWA.xyz's holder count, up 70.9% in the month to September 25, starts to shrink [4].

What to watch

  • Which on-chain venues the SEC selects under the Innovation Exemption, and how tight its volume caps and symbol limits turn out to be.
  • Whether Solana, at 997,000 holders, closes the gap on BNB Chain and Robinhood Chain once Binance's fee campaign ends.
  • Whether DeFi TVL tied to tokenized equities, now $289.1 million, grows faster than the roughly $4 billion market value it draws on.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories