Science1 publisher2 min readPublished
A clash with a flexible loop won an inhibitor 12,000-fold selectivity for p38 delta
Chemists in Tubingen measured the selectivity first and could not explain it. Crystallography at Buffalo found that the molecule bumps a flexible loop on p38 delta, and the loop kinks and wraps around it.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- A University at Buffalo-led team published an inhibitor of p38 delta, a kinase implicated in cancer, in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on Sept. 15.
- The molecule bumps a flexible loop on the protein, the loop kinks, and it then wraps around the compound, a sequence the authors call a bump-kink.
- Histidine 30, an amino acid sitting far from the binding site, stabilizes the kink and makes the shape change possible.
- The p38 family of mitogen-activated protein kinases regulates cellular activity and has long been difficult for small molecules to bind.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- capability A compound this selective turns p38 delta into something biologists can switch off cleanly. That is the step Laufer names as the route to knowing where the target is worth pursuing.
- constraint By the first author's own estimate, nine of ten such clashes make binding worse, so a chemist cannot schedule an induced fit without first solving the structure that shows one happened.
- contradiction Heppner describes a molecule designed to make the target adapt. The same account has the selectivity measured in Tubingen and only explained later in Buffalo. How much of this is a method depends on which version you take.
- precedent If a residue well outside the pocket decides selectivity, sequence differences that pocket-comparison screens discard become candidate handles in the next campaign against a hard kinase.
Potency and selectivity are not the same measurement, and the distance between the two gains says something about how this compound works. Potency against p38 delta went up 110-fold; selectivity went up 12,000-fold [3]. If selectivity here is the ratio of on-target to off-target binding, and both figures are quoted against the same earlier compounds, then binding to the off-targets fell by roughly 109-fold [16]. On that reading, most of the improvement came from the molecule getting worse at everything else. The release describes the comparison only as "previously available compounds" [3].
Nico Seidler synthesized several molecules in Stefan Laufer's lab at the University of Tubingen, and one was exceptionally selective for p38 delta. Why it was so selective stayed unclear until he moved to David Heppner's lab at Buffalo as a Fulbright fellow and solved the structure by X-ray crystallography [10]. "Typically, you design a molecule to fit the target. Here, we designed a molecule that makes the target adapt to it," Heppner said [9].
The clash is the part a shape-matching design would have engineered away. The nine-in-ten figure is Seidler's own characterization, not a count from a reported screen. "Nine times out of 10, this kind of bump would not result in binding. It would actually usually make things worse," Seidler said [6].
The transferable finding is a residue. Histidine 30 sits far from where the molecule binds, and it stabilizes the kink that lets the loop close around the compound [7]. A pocket-by-pocket comparison across the p38 family would never have flagged it. "It's rare to have a region of the protein so far from the binding site influence binding," Heppner said [8].
So the strategy question stays open. Aiming for induced fit requires knowing in advance which loop will kink. The evidence here is one compound whose structure was read after the fact [10], set against the authors' own estimate that most such clashes fail [6]. The narrower result is solid and useful. p38 kinases are notoriously hard for small molecules to bind [11], and until now there was no highly selective way to shut down p38 delta without touching its close relatives [12]. "Now that we have something selective for this target, we can better understand its biology and figure out where it might be best deployed therapeutically," Laufer said [13]. The work reported is structural and biochemical, funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the German Research Foundation. The account does not describe the compound tested in cells or animals [15][17].
What to watch
- A histidine 30 mutant: swap the residue, remeasure binding, and the kink hypothesis becomes directly testable.
- Cell-based kinase profiling and a p38 delta phenotype. Those would show whether biochemical selectivity survives in cells.
- Whether another group reports aiming for a bump-kink before crystallography instead of explaining one afterwards.