Leadership1 publisher3 min readPublished
August's 162,000-job gain masks a hiring rate near its lowest since the Great Recession
US payrolls grew by 162,000 in August, nearly triple the 55,000 economists expected. For anyone planning headcount, that net gain says less about candidate supply than the hiring and quit rates beneath it.
The Board Room · Leadership desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened
- LinkedIn economist Kory Kantenga compares employment to water in a sink, filled by new hires and drained by quits, layoffs and retirements.
- Hiring and quits have both slowed considerably and layoffs are relatively low, so fewer workers leave jobs than are hired even at a slow pace.
- The US economy has added jobs on a net basis in nine of the past 12 months.
- The hiring rate averages across the whole economy and counts a hire who replaces a departing worker the same as one who adds headcount.
Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- contradiction The payroll total and the hiring rate describe different markets, so a board summary that cites only the 162,000 overstates how many people are changing jobs.
- constraint Slow quits have two effects for employers: less attrition to backfill, and fewer people in work who are open to an approach when a team needs to grow.
- decision Recruiting budgets and offer ranges set this quarter depend on which figure the plan uses, and the flow data give little support for pricing in a candidate shortage.
The board-deck version of August goes like this: payrolls beat the consensus by 107,000 [1], the economy keeps adding jobs, so candidates will be scarce and offers will have to rise. The first two steps are in the data; the third is an inference from a net figure. Kantenga said he believes there is a "communications disconnect" between what labor statistics measure and how people interpret them [6]. "The decisions that we are making today that are going to potentially affect us for the rest of our lives are based around our perception of how the labor market is today," he said [7].
A gain of 162,000 [1] fits two very different markets. In one, employers hire quickly and workers leave quickly, with inflow ahead by that margin. In the other, both flows are slow and the outflow is slower still. Business Insider's account puts the US in the second, with the hiring rate, hires as a share of employment, hovering near its lowest level since the Great Recession for roughly a year [8]. A fast market means competing for people already on the move. A slow one has fewer people moving at all.
Slow hiring falls hardest on people looking for work. Nicholas Jenkins accepted a termination package from Amazon in late 2024 expecting to "roll into a new job," and instead struggled to get traction [13]. Dominique Alexander spent most of the year after her Microsoft contract ended in 2021 trying to land a full-time role there [15]. "I think I wasted a year of my life," she said [14]. From the employer's side, I'd expect most open roles to draw a deeper applicant pool than the payroll total implies. The report does not measure applicants per opening, so it cannot say whether a given role will draw a crowd.
A skeptic would say a national rate tells a company hiring for one occupation in one city very little. Sneha Puri, an economist at Indeed Hiring Lab, makes a version of that point. "A marketing analyst, a warehouse worker, and a home health aide looking at the same national hires rate are experiencing fundamentally different job markets," she said [10]. Government data can show which industries have seen stronger job growth or hiring, but the market for one occupation in one place is harder to gauge [11]. In my view that still leaves industry-level hires and quits as a better starting point than the national payroll total, and a company's own applicant counts as better than either.
This quarter's offer decisions set up next quarter's costs. A company that raises offers now to win candidates in a market with few movers carries that premium in its salary base next year. A company that holds offers flat is betting that hiring stays slow across the economy. If hiring picks up, competition for the same applicants comes back with it.
What to watch
- Friday's jobs report: a second large net gain alongside slow hiring would confirm the low-hire, low-fire pattern behind the August figure.
- Layoffs, now described as relatively low: if more workers leave while hiring stays slow, net job growth would stall.
- A recovery in quits: employed workers moving again would raise attrition for employers planning around today's stability.