Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

Standard Chartered extends its DeFi research to seven protocols in just over three months

Standard Chartered has initiated coverage on seven DeFi and onchain infrastructure projects since mid-June, with Ethena the latest. Each has its own revenue and token model, so clients still need a single yardstick to weigh the seven against each other.

The Investor · Invest desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Standard Chartered extends its DeFi research to seven protocols in just over three months
Photo: cryptotimes.io

What happened

  • Ethena follows Uniswap, Aave, Morpho, Chainlink, Sky and Arbitrum, a set spanning decentralized trading, lending, stablecoin issuance, data infrastructure and blockchain execution.
  • Standard Chartered began formal crypto research in September 2021 with Bitcoin and Ethereum, then expanded into layer-one networks including Avalanche and Solana.
  • A May investor presentation placed the bank's digital-assets research desk in the "access" part of its strategy, next to custody, institutional trading, tokenization and collateral services.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint With six valuation bases across seven protocols, a fund cannot line Uniswap up against Ethena from these notes alone, so the cross-protocol comparison stays with the client until the bank publishes a common measure.
  • precedent Protocols seeking bank-intermediated capital face tests on revenue quality, dilution, governance, concentration and legal rights, the framework Crypto Briefing says institutional research imposes.
  • exposure Clients receive targets on tokens outside the Bitcoin and Ether spot service the bank has built, so acting on a call may mean going to another venue.

The seven protocols come with six frameworks, because only Aave and Morpho share one [1]. Uniswap's model is tied to trading and liquidity. Aave and Morpho are read through lending volumes, deposits and revenue, and the Arbitrum work leans partly on fees paid by outside chains that use its technology [6]. Chainlink is treated as infrastructure whose economics depend on data, interoperability and institutional tokenization. Sky is examined as a stablecoin issuer and wholesale provider of capital, and Ethena is modelled on stablecoin growth, yield generation and token buybacks [7].

That is about one initiation every two weeks, seven in little more than three months [2]. Add the earlier Bitcoin, Ethereum and layer-one work and the bank's named coverage runs to at least eleven assets [3].

Crypto Briefing describes the set as the kind of sector-level analysis institutions use to compare businesses, risks and returns [8]. The breadth supports half of that claim. Comparing protocols needs a shared measure, and the one the publication names is whether any of the economics reach the token holder [9]. The Ethena initiation adds another token target [13], but the Crypto Briefing account does not include the targets or the revenue estimates behind them. So the seven business-level models can be confirmed, and a ranking across them cannot.

The coverage also sits inside a broader commercial push into digital assets [14]. Standard Chartered offers digital-asset custody [12]. The deliverable spot trading it launched through its UK branch in July 2025, and took to the UAE in September 2026, is for Bitcoin and Ether [11]. As the source describes the bank's products, the research now covers seven protocol tokens beyond the two its spot service handles. Analyst time is going to names before any execution product for them shows up in the record.

The initiations could come before custody or trading in the tokens themselves. They could also stay a service for clients who already hold those tokens elsewhere. A third route is that the bank starts publishing relative calls across the seven. That would make DeFi a sector in the analyst's sense, a group of businesses ranked on the same terms.

In my view the evidence supports business-by-business modelling across five categories [2] and does not yet show cross-protocol comparison. A note that ranked Uniswap, Aave and Ethena against each other on fees reaching holders would prove that wrong.

What to watch

  • A Standard Chartered note that compares the seven protocols on one measure, such as fee revenue reaching token holders.
  • Any of the seven covered tokens being added to the bank's custody or institutional trading service.
  • An eighth initiation, and whether it opens a new category or doubles up on an existing one.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories