Skip to content

Product1 publisher2 min readPublished

Sandia anchors a nanofiber between silicon pins to trap atoms with 5 milliwatts

Sandia's headline number describes the light delivered to the atoms inside a vacuum chamber, and the question for anyone sizing a deployed unit is what the lasers, electronics and pumps around it draw.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Photograph accompanying Sandia anchors a nanofiber between silicon pins to trap atoms with 5 milliwatts
Photo: interestingengineering.com

What happened

  • The group anchored the waveguide with small silicon pins on either side, using them as heat sinks so the structure both loads atoms and survives the laser heat.
  • The optical fiber doing the guiding is 420 nanometers thick, which the published account calls 200 times thinner than a human hair.
  • The team's stated next step is to put the guide and other components on a chip and build an inertial quantum sensor array.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint The heat fix works for a nanofiber held between pins, and Lee's goal of a full photonic integrated circuit in vacuum puts the same thermal problem back in front of the designers at a harder scale.
  • capability Keeping atoms under continuous laser observation inside a guide is what makes a moving, vibrating vehicle a credible host for atom interferometry at all.
  • precedent A 5 milliwatt figure becomes the reference other quantum navigation groups get measured against, including by buyers who will read it as a system number.

The number people will repeat is 5 milliwatts, and anyone sizing a navigation unit for an airframe needs to know which line of the power budget it belongs on. In Sandia's work it is the light delivered to the atoms. "Building on our nanofiber results, we showed cesium atoms can be trapped with just five milliwatts of optical power and that atomic coherence can be measured using sub-microwatt fiber-coupled beams, all while minimizing in-vacuum heat loads," Lee said in a press release [5].

Heat is what made this hard. "This idea has not been fully realized by the community for decades, due to challenges in dissipating heat from photonic devices in vacuum and in efficiently loading atoms around them," said Jongmin Lee, a quantum sensing scientist at the lab [4][6]. Before the pinned design, the choice was between a fragile structure that loads atoms well and breaks under heat, and a sturdy one that handles heat and not the atoms [7].

Interesting Engineering describes the 5 milliwatts as about 2,000 times less than a standard LED bulb [3], which puts the implied bulb at 10 watts [15]. The coherence measurement is the smaller figure: a sub-microwatt beam sits at least 5,000 times below the 5 milliwatt trap [16]. The same account gives the fiber as 420 nanometers thick and 200 times thinner than a human hair, implying a hair about 84 micrometers across [2][17].

What the account does not contain is a navigation number. There is no interferometer sensitivity, no bias drift figure, no mass, and no total system draw [18]. The results published in AVS Quantum Science are trapping power, coherence measurement and in-vacuum heat load [11][5].

Milliwatt claims from this field sort onto three lines: optical power delivered to the atoms, electrical power to generate and control that light, and the power to hold vacuum and carry heat away. Sandia moved the first line and, on Lee's own account, cut the load the third has to remove [5]. A result that moves the first line is a component result, so a program office reading it is choosing whether to fund integration now or wait for the chip and the sensor array the group says it wants to build [10]. The price of waiting is that the integration knowledge sits with whoever gets the guide and its optics onto one circuit first.

What to watch

  • Whether the in-vacuum heat load holds once the guide and its optics sit on one photonic circuit instead of a pinned fiber.
  • A published sensitivity or bias drift figure for the guided interferometer, which is what a navigation buyer compares against a fielded inertial unit.
  • Any Sandia statement of electrical power and vacuum overhead for a complete sensor array, not just optical power at the atoms.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories