Skip to content

Product1 publisher2 min readPublished

California would pay 1,000 households near the Inglewood Oil Field up to $5,000 each

California lawmakers passed AB 1661 and Gov. Gavin Newsom is expected to sign it by October. The money it hands out was collected from operators for keeping low-producing wells running at the Inglewood Oil Field.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Photograph accompanying California would pay 1,000 households near the Inglewood Oil Field up to $5,000 each
Photo: motherjones.com

What happened

  • California lawmakers passed AB 1661, which would steer money collected from penalized oil wells in Inglewood into direct cash aid for 1,000 nearby households with qualifying respiratory or reproductive health impacts.
  • The bill sets aside $5 million for payments of up to $5,000 per household under its initial structure, drawn from the state's community repair and reinvestment fund for people living nearest the field.
  • Assemblymember Isaac G. Bryan introduced the measure, and Gov. Gavin Newsom is expected to sign it by October.
  • Bryan said operators are charged $10,000 per well each month, with the revenue restricted to investments within 2.5 miles of the Inglewood Oil Field.
  • The penalty comes from Bryan's AB 2716, signed in 2024, which also requires the Inglewood Oil Field to close by 2030.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint The fund is fully committed at the maximum payment, so an administrator who wants to cover more than 1,000 households has to cut the size of the individual payment.
  • exposure A company buying wells around the field takes on a monthly per-well charge and a fixed 2030 shutdown date, both set by the 2024 law rather than by this year's bill.
  • decision If the 1,000 funded households report that cash is the repair they wanted, cash payments compete for the same penalty dollars as the affordable housing, urban greening and park spending Bryan has described for the fund.
  • precedent Any legislature copying the Inglewood design inherits a budget set by a fine schedule. The number of sick households does not set the payment size in the next town; the penalty rate and the well count do.

Regina Martin spent her childhood in the 1950s and 1960s among pumpjacks and assumed every child lived beside them, Capital B reported [9][19]. She thought the sulfurous, rotten-egg smell that made everyone "sick to [their] tummy" was ordinary [10]. She grew up on top of the largest urban oil drilling field in the country [11].

Up to $5,000 for each of 1,000 households comes to $5 million, the entire fund the bill names [16]. At the monthly per-well penalty Bryan describes, $5 million is 500 well-months of collections [17]. From the 2024 signing of AB 2716 to the field's 2030 closure deadline is about 72 months, so the cash program is worth roughly seven wells charged for every month that remains [18].

Keeping a low-producing well open is what triggers the charge on operators [5][4]. AB 1661 decides where the collected money goes, and it pays on a health test the bill describes as qualifying respiratory or reproductive health impacts [1]. The bill does not say who verifies those claims or how households apply [20].

Bryan represents the communities around the field and is the first Black legislator to chair the California Assembly's Natural Resources Committee. He said his constituents have faced lower life expectancies and higher rates of asthma and heart conditions for decades [8]. "The company has essentially just been extracting from the community with no investments in the community, no care in the community and what feels like no regard at times for the broader community," Bryan told Capital B [7].

He also called the cash program a pilot that could help determine whether direct payments are the form of repair residents most want [6]. A pilot with 1,000 funded slots collects that answer from the people who got a payment. Inglewood, Ladera Heights and Baldwin Hills all sit around the field [11]. Supporters call the law environmental reparations [13]. "My hope has always come at the community level, at the grassroots level," said Tianna Shaw-Wakeman, environmental justice program director with Black Women for Wellness in Los Angeles [14].

For a legislature drafting the next version of this, two counts decide how the program lands: funded slots, and households that pass the medical test. The gap between them is the share of applicants who get turned down, and it needs staff and a published standard.

The money also has a clock on it. The penalty exists to push operators to curb pollution and clean up their sites, and the field has to close by 2030 [4]. Each well that shuts stops paying into the fund [22].

What to watch

  • Whether Newsom signs AB 1661 by October, and whether the signed text keeps the $5,000 cap and the 1,000-household limit.
  • The published eligibility test for qualifying respiratory or reproductive health impacts, and who adjudicates disputed claims.
  • Annual penalty receipts into the community repair fund, and whether the $5 million is a one-off or a recurring pot.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories