Invest10 publishers2 min readPublished Updated
Prosecutors trace $176 million from Malaysian shippers in Earthmade's $300 million server case
US prosecutors accuse Earthmade Computer founder Greg Lui of smuggling over $300 million in servers to China via Malaysia and Singapore. Export rules can follow that hardware past its first foreign stop, so the case turns on who finally bought it and who paid.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- Lui, 38, also known as Yiu Kong Lui, founded Earthmade Computer in City of Industry, California, and was arrested on October 1 on allegations including export violations, smuggling and money laundering.
- Prosecutors say Lui and accomplices bought servers built around US-made GPUs in 2023 and 2024 and filed documents naming fictitious destinations and end users.
- Between January and October 2024, Earthmade received more than $176 million from two Malaysia-based shipping companies that prosecutors believe are connected to the scheme.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- exposure Resellers shipping GPU servers to Malaysia or Singapore are exposed when the buyer's parent is headquartered in China, Macau or another D:5 country, whatever the delivery address says.
- decision A distributor offered a sudden large order by a customer with little purchase history, or by one that will not name its parent, now has to choose between investigating ownership and losing the sale.
- constraint Some Chinese firms hold H200 licenses and Nvidia's RTX Pro 5500 may fall outside the rules, according to Cryptopolitan, so sellers have to clear the specific part and the specific owner together.
The payments make the case more specific than its $300 million total. Set against that figure, the $176 million Earthmade allegedly took from the two Malaysian shippers equals about 59% [1]. Spread over the ten months from January to October 2024, it comes to roughly $17.6 million a month [2]. The January 2024 deal priced its 27 servers at about $281,000 apiece [3]. At that rate the shippers' money equalled a little more than two such deals every month [4].
Who paid matters as much as how much. BIS lists a freight forwarder or logistics firm acting as the end user among its published signs that a diversion is under way [8], and the payers prosecutors identified are shipping companies [5]. Bill Essayli, the First Assistant US Attorney, put the emphasis on documents and routing. "This defendant allegedly used false paperwork and shipments through third countries to smuggle more than $300 million in export-controlled computer servers to China," he said [6].
The case can go three ways. It can stay a falsified-paperwork case against one City of Industry reseller and the accomplices described in the charges [2][3], leaving no one else in the supply chain more exposed than before. Prosecutors can follow the $176 million back through the two shippers to whoever paid them [5]. Or it can become a working test of the BIS guidance that ties license duties to the final recipient's parent company [7].
I think the third path matters most to anyone who sells servers, because it makes the parent company of the eventual recipient something a seller is expected to know. The counter-thesis is that the charges are about fictitious destinations and end users [3]. On that view the fault sits with whoever filled in the forms, and an honest seller shown a false end user faces nothing new. As reported, the case names only Lui; the two shippers are described only as believed to be connected to the scheme [5]. If it closes without a charge or penalty against any supplier, distributor or forwarder that handled these servers, the wider-risk reading is wrong.
The pressure on routes like this one comes from demand. The US first restricted advanced-computing chip exports in October 2022 and has tightened the rules several times since [9]. TrendForce points to heavy Chinese spending on AI infrastructure while access to advanced logic, high-bandwidth memory and CoWoS packaging stays constrained [11]. A September CSIS report says export controls can limit access to strategic technology but can also encourage circumvention and domestic substitution [10].
What to watch
- Whether prosecutors charge or name the two Malaysia-based shipping companies that allegedly paid Earthmade more than $176 million.
- Whether BIS penalises any supplier or distributor that sold GPU servers to Earthmade, which would test the May 2026 parent-company guidance against a real seller.
- Whether court filings give a total server count or identify the end buyers in China.