Science1 distinct publisher3 min readPublished
The Iowa case rests on nineteenth-century clearance and a dispersal rate of about 46 metres per emergence rather than on climate, and that arithmetic puts regrown forest centuries beyond reach of the broods that survived.
The Scientist · Science desk

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Convert the dispersal number into an annual rate and the pessimism becomes arithmetic. About 46 metres per emergence, spread across a 17-year cycle, is roughly 2.7 metres a year [1]. Nine decades on from that clearance, a surviving brood at that rate has had about five emergences and advanced something like 230 metres [2]. A kilometre of replanted woodland sits about 370 years away for a 17-year brood, and about 280 years away for one of the four species on a 13-year cycle [3]. Those figures come from a single measured step distance, which is what the movement model was built on [12].
The mechanism is odd because the animal is. Nymphs feed on tree roots for the whole underground stretch, and the study treats the roots of old-growth forest as their sole essential food source [2]. Cut the trees and the cohort beneath them cannot walk out mid-cycle. As Andrew Forbes, the corresponding author, puts it, the animals die out and it may take hundreds of years for them to get back [5], long after new trees have filled the gap [4].
Two different kinds of evidence sit under that conclusion. The historical half is observational: a sequence assembled from newspapers, aerial photographs and other records, with the timing lining up, but no unlogged tract in the county reported as a comparison [9]. Correlation of that shape is still worth something, because the direction is not ambiguous. Forests came down; broods that Forbes went looking for near Iowa City were not there [17].
The relocation is closer to an experiment, and its failure answers a different question than the one about food. Periodical cicadas have no defence against predators other than abundance, in emergences that can reach hundreds of thousands of insects per acre [7][8]. The number released into the new site was at most about a tenth of that peak density [4]. So the test established that a sub-threshold cohort does not survive predation, which Forbes concedes directly: "I thought if we got big enough numbers, it would work. I was wrong" [15]. Whether a brood seeded at natural density could establish in restored forest remains untested.
The thing this does not tell you is when, or whether all seven periodical species share the trajectory [6]. The reconstruction covers one Iowa county [9]; broods embedded in large, continuous forest elsewhere are a different sum. Nor does the account of the study weigh warming against land use [18]. The argument runs on clearance and a dispersal rate and needs no climate term to reach its conclusion [2][3], which makes it cleaner than a multi-driver story and also narrower.
An insect lineage that traces to a common ancestor nearly four million years old [6] now carries a range map largely written by when the trees came down, read back at 2.7 metres a year [1].
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
In a study published in Ecology, biologists at the University of Iowa concluded that periodical cicadas, the species that emerge every 13 or 17 years, could be heading toward extinction.
The main reason given for the extinction trajectory is the historical loss of old-growth forests, whose roots are the insects' sole essential food source during their prolonged time underground.
Even when old, intact forests are replaced by new trees, the insects are unable to adapt because they move very slowly into new habitats, the biologists found.
Andrew Forbes is a professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Iowa and the study's corresponding author.
Forbes: "Forests get cut down, and they regrow, but these animals are living underground for 17 years, and when you cut down the old trees, the cicadas lose their food source, they die out, and it might take them hundreds of years to get back."
There are seven periodical cicada species, four with 13-year life cycles and three with 17-year cycles, all originating from a common ancestor nearly 4 million years ago; they are found only in North America.
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · September 4, 2026
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
science
A match-head snail in Lake Alexandrina doubled its genome under a million years ago1 distinct publisher
science
Researchers hung camera traps 30 metres up in Lomami to map mammals layer by layer1 distinct publisher
science
742 species, six continents: what grows back on plowed grassland is not what was lost1 distinct publisher
science
Nine wild butterflies to 1,300 releases: the Poweshiek skipperling's method is the point1 distinct publisher
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Traceable numbers, one voice
The argument rests on a handful of checkable figures. Earlier work supplies the 46 metres per emergence, newspapers and aerial photographs show forest gone from Johnson County by the 1930s, and the 20,000 released insects were dead within a week. That holds together at county scale and thins out fast range-wide, and all of it reaches the reader through the University of Iowa's own summary, with the corresponding author as the only person quoted on the science.
No uptake to count
There is nothing to measure on the practice side. The translocation was an experiment by the authors rather than a method anyone adopted, and this reporting says nothing about whether a preserve manager, county conservation board or restoration programme has changed a decision because of the paper.
'Doomed' outruns one county
'Doomed to extinction' is the framing the reader meets first; 'legacy effects of century-old forest removal' is what the paper calls itself. Between those sits the scope problem: field evidence from one Iowa county and one brood, applied to seven species across eastern North America. The dispersal arithmetic itself needs no discount — at 2.7 metres a year, centuries really is the right unit.
University release, republished intact
This is a university communications piece about its own faculty's paper, reproduced by phys.org with the release's shape preserved down to the section on the undergraduate's summer programme — content no independent reporter would file. Cutting the other way, Forbes is quoted saying the experiment failed and that he was wrong to expect otherwise, which is an unusual thing for promotional copy to keep.
Solid on the arithmetic
We can stand behind the numbers and behind what the study says it found. What we cannot test with one account is whether Johnson County's history describes the other broods, or how many populations remain inside protected forest — and there is no second telling to weigh this one against.