Skip to content

Product1 publisher2 min readPublished

LinkedIn hands resume checking to your old colleagues and your employer's page admin

The new vouching and brand-control tools give the checking work to colleagues who have known you for a year and to page admins clicking through profiles one at a time. LinkedIn says 115 million members are already verified.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Illustration accompanying LinkedIn hands resume checking to your old colleagues and your employer's page admin

What happened

  • LinkedIn said on Wednesday that members can now vouch that a colleague or classmate held the experience listed on their profile, an action it keeps separate from an endorsement.
  • A voucher needs a verified profile, two-factor authentication on the account, and a connection to the person going back at least a year.
  • Company page admins can open the account of someone falsely claiming employment and remove that person from the page and from search results tied to it.
  • Rodriguez said LinkedIn's existing verification tools have covered 115 million members and more than 700,000 companies.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost Whoever inherited the company page now owns a standing impersonation queue, and clearing it is work only a page admin can do.
  • constraint The vouch gates put the signal furthest out of reach for people with the thinnest platform history: a first job, an account under a year old.
  • exposure A vouch is one named person's word tied to their verified account, so the cost of backing a false work history lands on the colleague who gave it.

When a page admin removes a false employee, the job itself stays on that person's profile and under that person's control. The plumbing around it changes: the clickable link to the company page goes away, and the work experience stops displaying as verified [5]. Oscar Rodriguez, LinkedIn's VP of product, told TechCrunch: "We hope that this provides signals and context to members to make decisions." [13]

So the product of an employer's cleanup is a missing badge and a link that leads nowhere. A recruiter skimming twenty profiles before lunch sees the same job title and the same dates either way.

Rodriguez said the pressure behind all of this is cost. "The backdrop for all this is that faking credibility has never been cheaper or easier than it is today; and conversely, showcasing credibility has never mattered more," he told TechCrunch [9].

The benefit LinkedIn puts a number on is reach. Verified members "receive, on average, 50% more post views than non-verified profiles, and they get 90% more impressions as well," Rodriguez said [10]. Both figures measure how the feed treats a profile, not whether a verified member got hired sooner or whether a hiring manager spent less time clearing a shortlist.

Divide the two totals Rodriguez gave and the lopsidedness shows: 115 million verified members against more than 700,000 verified companies is roughly 164 verified members per verified company [12], and since 700,000 is a floor, the true ratio is lower.

None of this replaces LinkedIn's own badge. The company is widening where a verified identity appears off the platform, with Truecaller and PeerSpot joining Adobe and UserTesting; a Truecaller user can attach a LinkedIn verified identity so it shows to whoever picks up the call [11].

The piece with the most operational weight is still in testing. Page admins would be able to require workplace verification, such as a check through a work email address, of any member who tries to associate with the page from that point on [6]. Anyone who has left the company lost that mailbox. TechCrunch's report does not say how a former employee would clear the check [16].

For an employer weighing that setting, it is worth counting how many people legitimately list the company and can no longer send mail from its domain. That group includes everyone who left. It also includes contractors and field workers, whom Rodriguez said fall outside the removal feature, though he said they will have other means of claiming their association with the company that employs them [8].

What to watch

  • Whether the workplace-verification requirement leaves testing, and what LinkedIn tells former employees to use once their work email is gone.
  • Whether page admins get a queue or a bulk action instead of opening suspect accounts one at a time.
  • Whether a vouch ever affects search ranking or recruiter filters, or stays a display element on the profile.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories