Skip to content

Build1 publisher3 min readPublished

TRAI makes caller-ID apps write their users' spam taps into the telcos' blockchain registry

India's updated commercial communications rules push spam reports from call-management apps into the operator-run blockchain platform. Truecaller, whose Indian users logged about 42 billion spam calls last year, says the exchange runs one way.

The Engineer · Build desk

Illustration accompanying TRAI makes caller-ID apps write their users' spam taps into the telcos' blockchain registry

What happened

  • TRAI's updated commercial communications rules require services that let users flag calls as spam to send that data into the telecom operators' blockchain platform, the registry used to police commercial messaging.
  • The regulator said the change increases the volume of complaints available and combines third-party app data with telecom infrastructure to identify violators and cut unwanted calls.
  • Operators may charge up to 5 paise a minute to terminate automated calls, with an exception carved out for certain defined number ranges.

Compiled by The EngineerSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • exposure The crowd-sourced reports that distinguish a caller-ID product now flow to the operators whose infrastructure the product runs on, which is the basis of Truecaller's anti-competitive complaint.
  • constraint An app team cannot build to this yet: the data fields, the user-notification duty and the retention window are still with the regulator, so the size of the handoff is set later.
  • contradiction TRAI expects more complaints to catch more violators, while Truecaller says unwanted calls climbed sharply under the number-range carve-out it has followed since late last year.
  • precedent A product that is not a telecom operator is now obliged to feed an operator-run registry, and the final text leaves the enforcement route against non-operators unsettled.

The operators' blockchain platform is the registry that carries commercial-messaging control and the anti-spam restrictions applied against senders [1]. A spam tap only triggers one of those restrictions once it is written into the registry. Sumeesh Shrivastava, a partner at a consultancy, said the amendment joins two layers of the system: the operators run the network and the blockchain platform. Above that infrastructure, the apps identify and filter calls [10].

TRAI has yet to set which data goes to operators, how users are told, and how long it may be stored and used [13]. The final text also leaves open whether the enforcement route from the March draft, grounded in India's IT law, survived, and how the duty applies to companies that are not operators [11]. Kazim Rizvi, founder of the think tank Dialogue, separated the single user complaint from broader disclosure. That broader disclosure may take in reputation signals and the analytical systems a service uses to decide that a call is suspicious [12]. Shipping individual complaints is a small write path. Exporting the scoring behind them is a different product.

Truecaller builds its verdicts from community reports, automatic detection and other signals [5]. More than 350 million of its more than 500 million monthly active users are in India, about 70 percent of the base on the stated figures [4][4]. A spokesperson said, in the report's translation, that the requirement is a one-way exchange creating anti-competitive conditions, because commercially valuable data from call-management apps is transferred to telecom operators [3].

The company counted about 42 billion spam calls to its Indian users during 2025, a figure that includes calls blocked, marked unwanted or left unanswered [6]. It says it blocked close to 12 billion of them [7]. That is roughly 29 percent of the total [1], and about 120 spam calls per Indian user across the year [2].

The carve-out stays. Apps still may not automatically mark as spam the calls from certain government number ranges used for promotional, service and transactional traffic, although a subscriber can block them on the handset [8]. A Truecaller spokesperson said the company's data and user response show unwanted calls rose sharply because of this free access for spammers, and that Truecaller has been following the rule since the end of last year [9].

The automated-calling half is tidier drafting. A number dialled by software without direct human action falls under the app-to-subscriber rules, which now cover robocalls and pre-recorded or artificially generated voice [14]. Companies have to tell operators in advance that they use it and list the numbers involved, and TRAI will treat undeclared automated calls as spam [15]. Satya N. Gupta, a former TRAI additional secretary, said the rules do not prohibit a business from using AI or other automated dialling and only require it to disclose the use to operators [16]. Operators may charge up to 5 paise a minute to terminate such calls, with an exception for certain defined ranges [17], so twenty minutes of automated dialling costs one rupee [3].

What to watch

  • TRAI publishing the field list, the user-notification duty and the retention window for app-sourced reports.
  • Whether the IT-law enforcement route from the March draft is applied to apps that are not telecom operators.
  • Whether the government number-range carve-out is revisited after Truecaller's claim that unwanted calls rose sharply under it.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories