Science1 publisher3 min readPublished
Rice sinters diamond at low pressure, then watches it turn to graphite in microseconds
A diamond-cubic boron nitride-cobalt composite survived a projectile at over Mach 7. The interesting part is how it survived: the diamond partly stopped being diamond.
The Scientist · Science desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened
- Rice University researchers developed a way to stabilize diamond during high-temperature and low-pressure processing, creating a strong bulk composite and discovering that high-speed collisions can rapidly transform diamond into graphite. The study is published in Materials Today.
- Pulickel Ajayan, lead author: "This was quite an exciting outcome as it is nearly impossible to sinter diamond at lower pressures, and this new process we have developed could lead to the large-scale manufacturing of diamond-based composites."
- Small diamond particles are relatively inexpensive and easy to produce, but turning them into larger diamond structures has proved difficult, according to Ajayan.
- Sintering uses heat and pressure to form a solid; with diamond, the high temperatures can turn it into graphite.
- High-pressure, high-temperature methods can produce polycrystalline diamond, but they require extreme pressure and limit the size of the samples produced.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
Rice University researchers say they have found a way to keep diamond stable through high-temperature, low-pressure processing, producing a strong bulk composite, and that hypersonic impacts on that composite convert diamond into graphite within microseconds; the work is published in Materials Today [1]. The first result matters because it moves bulk diamond parts away from the extreme-pressure press; the second matters because it treats diamond as a material that dissipates energy by changing phase, not simply as a hard surface [11][15].
The manufacturing problem has been unglamorous and specific. Small diamond particles are cheap and easy to make, but joining them into larger structures has not worked well, according to Pulickel Ajayan, the study's lead author [3][20]. Sintering applies heat and pressure to consolidate powders, and with diamond the heat is the enemy: it drives the carbon to graphite [4]. High-pressure, high-temperature routes do yield polycrystalline diamond, but they demand extreme pressure and cap the size of the part you can make [5].
The Rice approach mixes microscopic diamond grains with cubic boron nitride, which has similar properties, plus cobalt as a binder and stabiliser, and consolidates the mix by spark plasma sintering [6][7]. The result is diamond particles embedded in a boron nitride matrix with cobalt distributed throughout [7]. Abhijit Biswas, the first author, describes the composite as almost nonmachinable and tough because of those dispersed diamond particles [8][20]. Ajayan's claim is the load-bearing one for anyone with a furnace: sintering diamond at lower pressures is nearly impossible, and he says this process could lead to large-scale manufacturing of diamond-based composites [2].
The impact testing is thinner than the framing suggests. The team fired metal projectiles 1 to 4 millimetres across at hypersonic speed; the composite held together against one projectile moving at more than seven times the speed of sound, and came apart under a larger projectile moving faster [9][10]. That is a pass and a fail, not a survivability envelope, and the projectile diameters span a factor of four, so size and speed vary together in the reported shots [21]. The phys.org release does not give the sintering pressure or temperature, the sample dimensions, or quantitative strength numbers [22].
What the team did characterise is the transformation. Nearly all the diamond involved became graphite within microseconds during the collision [11]. Biswas says extreme impact drove the change on that timescale rather than through the slower heat-driven route normally associated with it [12]. The researchers examined the fractured composite and ran molecular dynamics simulations, finding regions where diamond and graphite met [13]. The study attributes the change to shock energy plus structural rearrangement of the carbon [14]. Both phases are carbon; the atomic arrangement is what makes one hard and the other soft [16]. And the conversion absorbed part of the collision energy as the structure changed [15].
That is the reframing worth keeping. Diamond is prized for hardness and high thermal conductivity in extreme-condition technologies [17]; here a fraction of it is spent, deliberately, as a sacrificial energy sink. Biswas argues that understanding phase change under force, alongside strength and hardness, could guide the design of protective materials [19], and Rice points at aerospace and defence as the likely users [18].
Watch for the process numbers: pressure, temperature, and the largest part made. Watch also whether a graphitised layer is repeatable or single-shot, because a material that toughens by consuming its own diamond has a service life, not just a hardness value.