Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

Syria's former antiquities chief documents how 30,000 objects left Deir ez-Zor ahead of ISIS

Maamoun Abdulkarim ran Syria's antiquities directorate when the Deir ez-Zor Museum was emptied in the summers of 2014 and 2015, and he has now published his own account of the operation in a curatorship journal.

The Scientist · Science desk

Photograph accompanying Syria's former antiquities chief documents how 30,000 objects left Deir ez-Zor ahead of ISIS
Photo: go.com

What happened

  • About 30,000 artifacts were moved out of the Deir ez-Zor Museum during the summers of 2014 and 2015, while the city faced imminent capture by ISIS.
  • The account is a study by Maamoun Abdulkarim, now professor of archaeology and history at the University of Sharjah, published in Museum Management and Curatorship.
  • Abdulkarim directed Syria's Directorate-General of Antiquities and Museums from 2012 to 2017 and oversaw the evacuation himself.
  • Syria had 35 archaeological museums before 2011, and Deir ez-Zor, while not the largest, held collections from Halaf, Dura-Europos and Mari.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Operational history of this kind is almost always written by its own protagonist, so checking the decision timeline depends on other participants publishing theirs.
  • decision A museum director facing a siege warning now has a citable rule for moving early, from someone who took the professional risk of following it.
  • precedent The paper is pitched at services in Iraq, Libya, Sudan and Yemen, and a single documented success tends to be adopted as a template well before anyone validates it.

Roughly 30,000 objects left the museum, and nobody knows what share of its holdings that was [1]. Abdulkarim's paper stops short of estimating how many objects were looted across Syria during the war, or how many of the country's 35 pre-war museums kept their collections intact [9][10]. The count describes what left one building on the Euphrates, in a province whose oil and gas fields made it one of the war's most contested [20].

Spread evenly across two three-month summers, 30,000 objects comes to about 167 a day [1]. Every one of them had to travel the narrow and highly vulnerable corridor that was the museum's only link to the military airport, in a city where access was severely restricted [6].

The substantive claim in the study is about what makes an operation like that possible. Logistics is one part of it. "It fundamentally involves decision-making, institutional resilience, trust, and the ability to adapt rapidly to changing circumstances," Abdulkarim said of working amid active hostilities [5]. Trust is one of four items on that list, and the study describes a single museum, written up by the man who decided its fate [2]. Separating the four would need a comparison institution, one where staff trust held and something else gave way. The operation was run by Syria's own antiquities directorate, which Abdulkarim headed from 2012 to 2017 [4].

On timing he is unambiguous. "There is rarely a perfect moment to act during an armed conflict; often, delaying a decision in search of greater certainty poses a greater danger than acting under uncertainty," he said [16]. The prompt came from across the border. "This period formed a critical juncture, as it coincided with the fall of Mosul in Iraq, the looting of its civilizational museum, and the destruction of antiquities from Nineveh and Assyria," he writes [17], and those events "compelled Syrian antiquities authorities to promptly reevaluate protection policies and expedite emergency measures in cities that were at risk of siege or collapse" [18]. He also writes that he accepted the exposure: "My foremost priority was the protection of cultural heritage, and I was prepared to bear whatever personal and professional risks and consequences those decisions might entail" [19].

The same gap runs through Syrian heritage generally. There is no official estimate of how many archaeologically significant sites the country holds; the antiquities department keeps a file of about 10,000 [12], mostly places already excavated or visible from the surface [13]. Large areas were never surveyed, and Abdulkarim writes that tens of thousands is a reasonable estimate [14]. Deir ez-Zor was not the largest of the 35 museums, and its holdings came from Halaf, Dura-Europos and Mari [7].

What to watch

  • Whether DGAM or its successor releases a pre-war inventory for Deir ez-Zor, which would show what share of the collection the 30,000 objects represent.
  • Whether other museum and directorate staff publish their own accounts of the 2014 and 2015 moves, allowing the decision timeline to be checked against Abdulkarim's.
  • Whether antiquities services in Iraq, Libya, Sudan or Yemen turn the paper's timing rule into written emergency procedure.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories