Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Hill and Cotton revive their 2018 bid to exempt brokerages under 150 staff from PCAOB audits
French Hill and Tom Cotton want broker-dealers with fewer than 150 employees and no custody of client assets out of the PCAOB audit regime that Dodd-Frank extended to every registered dealer in 2010.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- The Hill-Cotton bill would free qualifying small broker-dealers from hiring a PCAOB-registered audit firm for annual inspections of their financial statements, regulatory compliance and capital.
- Eligibility is limited to privately held firms with fewer than 150 employees that do not hold clients' assets.
- Dodd-Frank extended the Sarbanes-Oxley audit rule in 2010 to every broker-dealer registered with the SEC, public or private, after Bernard Madoff's $65 billion fraud.
- Lieblong & Associates, a four-person Little Rock brokerage, took the issue to Cotton in 2017 and its owner reported compliance costs of about $40,000 a year.
- The bill has no Democratic co-sponsors and, according to a senior Senate aide, is probably unlikely to move during a lame duck session after the elections.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- decision For any firm under the headcount line, the PCAOB-registered audit fee becomes the standing cost of holding client assets, so giving up custody is the cheaper configuration.
- cost The public case rests on one firm's $10,000 per employee, and without a count of qualifying firms the industry-wide saving from the exemption cannot be sized.
- exposure The bill's route runs through a committee that may change hands in November, when past opponents would be positioned to reclaim the majority that decides whether it advances.
- precedent Passage would carry Hill's size-and-risk tailoring argument out of bank supervision and into the audit rules governing securities firms.
The second eligibility test is custody, and that is what decides who qualifies: a three-person shop holding customer assets keeps its PCAOB-registered auditor, while a 149-person firm holding none is exempt [3]. Dodd-Frank's extension answered an investor fraud [6], and the carve-out is drawn to leave the requirement wherever client money sits. The bill unwinds that 2010 extension. The 2002 statute applied PCAOB audits to publicly traded firms [5]. There is a second objection the custody test does not settle, and it is capital: the annual inspection the bill would make optional covers regulatory compliance and capital as well as the financial statements [4], and a firm with no custody can still fall short of its capital requirement.
Lieblong's roughly $40,000 works out to $10,000 for each of the four people in the shop [7][1]. The headcount ceiling written into the bill is 37.5 times that firm's size [2]. Small brokers have complained for years that PCAOB audits cost significantly more than the generally accepted auditing standards work they replaced [8], and that the audits run to tens of thousands of dollars a year [9].
"Currently, a 3-person, non-public small business is held to the same standards as Merrill Lynch; this is not right, fair or reasonable," some 300 small broker-dealers wrote to Senate Banking Committee leaders in 2018 [10]. Regulators "wrote this rule for Wall Street and then applied it to small firms on Main Street," Cotton said in a statement [13].
Hill introduced the latest House version on Sept. 17, eight years after the first one, with Cotton set to follow with the Senate companion [1][2][3]. In between, the measure got practically nowhere save a successful House Financial Services markup in 2018 [15]. Four committee Democrats voted for it then and two have since left Congress [18][4], with Vicente Gonzalez, a longtime co-sponsor, and Jim Himes among those still in place [19].
Hill chairs the committee [23] and came out of the business, having founded and run Delta Trust & Banking Corp., a broker-dealer and community bank, before selling it in 2014 after winning his seat [20]. Several of his other bills this year would tailor community bank rules to a lender's size and business risk instead of applying big-bank rules [21]. "Small, privately held broker-dealers deserve that same attention," Hill said in a statement [12]. A senior Senate aide said the two Arkansans keep hearing from broker-dealers "fed up with accounting fees" [22].
Two paths are live: the exemption attaches to something larger this session, or it starts again in a new Congress. I would expect the second, because a bill that has drawn one markup in eight years [15][3] needs someone else's vehicle to move. And the case for it is sized off the smallest example available: if most firms under the 150-employee ceiling are nothing like a four-person shop paying $10,000 a head [1][2], the relief is priced on the wrong firm.
What to watch
- Whether any Democrat signs on to Cotton's Senate companion, which would be the first bipartisan cover the bill has had since 2018.
- Whether the exemption is attached to a larger capital-formation package before the session ends or gets a standalone markup.
- Control of the House Financial Services Committee after November, and whether Gonzalez and Himes stay on the bill.