Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

Coral and stalagmite records trace one 40-year Indian-Pacific climate break to volcanoes

Woods Hole researchers pushed the record of Indian-Pacific coupling back to the early 1600s using corals, tree rings and stalagmites. Only one earlier interval, 1810 to 1850, shows the relationship breaking down.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying Coral and stalagmite records trace one 40-year Indian-Pacific climate break to volcanoes

What happened

  • A Woods Hole team reconstructed how closely the tropical Indian and Pacific oceans have tracked each other since the early 1600s, using corals, tree rings and stalagmites alongside climate model simulations.
  • Measured against the 400-year baseline, the researchers describe the weakening seen since the 1980s as exceptional and attribute it to greenhouse gas emissions rather than natural variability.
  • The paper appeared in Nature Communications as "Coupling of Pacific and Indian Ocean variability disrupted by 19th century volcanism."

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Any test of whether the modern weakening is unusual has to run on proxy data, because the instrumental record is shorter than a single natural cycle. The confidence in the word exceptional therefore rests on what corals, tree rings and stalagmites can resolve.
  • decision Forecast groups that fit Indian Ocean rainfall to Pacific state on twentieth century data now have a documented case of that relationship failing. That is an argument for testing skill on moving calibration windows.
  • capability The 1810 to 1850 episode gives modellers a reconstructed case of an externally forced decoupling to validate eruption response against, and the size-plus-background-state dependence gives them a specific behaviour to reproduce.

The link under test runs from the Pacific into the Indian Ocean. Conditions across the Indian Ocean often respond to changes in the Pacific, and that response helps set rainfall, temperature and atmospheric circulation patterns across the tropics [2]. Since the 1980s the Indian Ocean has increasingly departed from what Pacific conditions would predict, a weakening researchers have linked to warming [3]. Judging whether that departure is unusual is the harder problem, because reliable instrumental records cover less than a century, too short a sample to separate an unusual event from a long natural cycle [4].

So the team reconstructed both basins from corals, tree rings and stalagmites, back to the early 1600s, and paired the reconstruction with model simulations [1]. That extension adds exactly one earlier case. Through most of the past 400 years the basins stayed closely connected, and only between 1810 and 1850 did the relationship change significantly, which the researchers link to a series of major tropical eruptions that weakened the Pacific's usual influence [5]. The window is 40 years [1], about a tenth of the reconstructed period [2]. It also falls outside instrumental coverage: a record reaching back less than a century begins no earlier than about 1926, some 76 years after that episode ended [3].

Proxies establish coincidence in time. The causal case comes from the model runs, and simulations covering the past thousand years supported the volcanic interpretation [6]. Those runs also found that the strength of the disruption depended on both eruption size and the background climate state at the time [7], so a future eruption of similar magnitude need not produce a similar weakening.

"The modern data we have is limited and doesn't go back far enough. With climate models and paleo-records, we are now able to say with more confidence that the recent changes we are seeing are really quite exceptional," said lead author Shawn Wang [8], a former WHOI graduate student now a postdoc at the University of Colorado Boulder [9]. The release describes the modern shift as exceptional [15]. It gives no correlation coefficient, and does not say what window the comparison covers or where the modern value falls in the reconstructed distribution [4]. The paper's title keeps the peer-reviewed claim on the older event: "Coupling of Pacific and Indian Ocean variability disrupted by 19th century volcanism" [12].

For a seasonal forecast, the operational question is whether a Pacific-to-Indian Ocean relationship fitted on twentieth century data still holds. This record contains one earlier interval in which it did not [5], and the modern observations show the same relationship loosening again [3]. Measuring what that costs in forecast skill is beyond a 400-year proxy reconstruction.

Caroline Ummenhofer, a senior scientist at WHOI and a co-author [11], said the work is "one of the first studies to examine the breakdown in the connection between the Pacific and Indian oceans using evidence from past climates, modern observations, and climate models" [13]. She also said that "global warming and human emissions are now overwhelming the Pacific's natural influence on the Indian Ocean" [10].

What to watch

  • Whether the Nature Communications paper's correlation windows and proxy counts support the exceptional label at conventional significance levels.
  • Whether single-forcing runs, greenhouse gases alone against volcanic aerosols alone, reproduce the post-1980s weakening.
  • Whether forecast centres recalibrate Pacific-to-Indian Ocean relationships on moving windows instead of full-record fits.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories