Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

Barr argues for further hikes one week after the Fed's first increase in three years

Governor Michael Barr thinks last week's increase probably will not get inflation back to 2%. The committee's own projections leave floating-rate borrowers budgeting for either one more quarter point or two before December.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Barr argues for further hikes one week after the Fed's first increase in three years
Photo: americanbanker.com

What happened

  • The increase the Federal Open Market Committee approved last week was the first in three years, and a week later Governor Michael Barr was publicly making the case for more.
  • That vote was unanimous and moved the target range on the federal funds rate to 3.75% to 4%.
  • Barr did not indicate whether he would support an increase at next month's meeting, at the December meeting, or at some later point.
  • Speaking at a Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago housing event, he said the core problem with shelter costs is that home prices and rents have grown more sharply than household incomes.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision A treasurer setting the interest line for the next two quarters has to choose between the committee's median projection and its more hawkish tail, and the choice shows up in every dollar drawn after October.
  • contradiction One speech argues for a higher policy rate and blames rates already in place for freezing housing turnover, so anyone reading the Fed for a thaw in mortgage volumes has two signals to weigh against each other.
  • exposure Banks writing the housing credit Barr credited to Community Reinvestment Act incentives, more than $430 billion of loans and related investments in 2024, are underwriting into the tighter path he described.
  • precedent A sitting governor putting further tightening in his base case a week after a unanimous vote raises the bar for a pause. October now needs an argument for standing still.

Twelve of the members who see a higher benchmark by year end put the move at a single quarter point, and four put it at half a point, the equivalent of two increases [5]. Average the sixteen projections and you get 31.25 basis points of further tightening [15]. From the current 3.75% to 4% range [3], that puts the top of the range near 4.31% by December [16]. Three quarters of the sixteen are in the one-increase camp [17].

The four half-point projections are the part to price. Two meetings are left this year, the next in late October [6], so a member projecting 50 basis points is projecting an increase at each of them [18]. One quarter point puts the range at 4% to 4.25%; half a point puts it at 4.25% to 4.5% [19].

Barr called last week's move a "needed" recalibration of policy to address persistently high inflation, and probably not sufficient to return price growth to the 2% target [8]. "In my view, given changes to the economy, we were out of position, and we made an adjustment in the right direction," Barr said. "In my base case, further policy adjustments are likely to be needed to ensure inflation comes down to target in a timely fashion" [2]. He did not say whether he would support an increase in October, in December or later [7].

The venue was an affordable housing event hosted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago [9], and Barr told it that housing has become "increasingly unaffordable for many Americans for a number of years" [10]. He put part of the blame on the mortgage market itself. "Many families benefited from very low mortgage rates before 2022; these households are now less likely to move given the high rates they would face," he said. "This lock-in effect reduces both demand and supply and thus housing market dynamism" [12]. Higher policy rates widen the gap between the mortgage a household holds and the one it would have to take.

I would budget for one more quarter point by December and carry the second as a live risk, on the strength of Barr's stated base case [2] and sixteen projections pointing the same way [4]. A projection is not a vote. The unanimity that produced last week's increase [3] would serve an October hold just as well. An October hold, followed by December projections that walk the year-end level back to 4%, is what would settle this against tightening.

What to watch

  • The late October meeting: whether the vote stays unanimous and whether Barr backs a move he declined to date.
  • December's summary of economic projections, and whether the year-end level comes back down to 4%.
  • Whether other committee members attach a specific number of increases to the "further policy adjustments" language.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories