Skip to content

Leadership1 publisher2 min readPublished

Flat hiring for a second year turns the low-hire market into a planning assumption

US hiring has run near its weakest level since the Great Recession for two straight years, and an Indeed Hiring Lab economist now calls that the new normal.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

What happened

  • Sneha Puri, an economist at Indeed Hiring Lab, wrote this month that the labor market remains low-hire and low-fire and is starting to look less like a phase and more like the new normal.
  • In an August Indeed survey of more than 100 US economists, respondents on average expected hiring demand to decline modestly over the next year.
  • Quits have fallen, which leaves employers fewer roles to backfill, and thin hiring in turn leaves workers fewer jobs worth quitting for.

Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint A quiet attrition dashboard costs a leader information: it no longer distinguishes a team that wants to stay from a team that cannot move.
  • decision Cutting junior headcount this year also sets how many mid-level candidates exist to hire from in three, so the entry-level line is a multi-year workforce decision being made on a single-year cost case.
  • exposure Severance and outplacement policies built around a search measured in months now under-provide for people whose spells run into a second year.
  • contradiction The research on AI cuts both ways, so a leader who explains the hiring floor by AI adoption is picking one of two contradictory bodies of evidence and should say which.

Promotions and transfers are the only route left to a pay reset. When people stay because there is nowhere to go, the promotion and transfer pipeline is the only place a senior person can test what they are worth. The pay conversation that an outside offer used to force now happens only if the employer schedules it [4]. Companies that leave that pipeline idle are deferring a repricing to whenever the external market opens.

The cost of being let go has changed in the meantime. Gautam Dev's software engineering role ended in October 2024. He was still looking for full-time work when Business Insider published in September 2026, roughly 23 months later, against earlier gaps in a two-decade-plus IT career that had lasted only a few months [9][15][16]. "I never thought it'd be so severe because I have always been able to find a job," said Dev, who is in his 60s and lives in Dallas [10].

The Federal Reserve raised on Wednesday for the first time since 2023 while it continued to grapple with elevated inflation, having lowered from 2024 highs [12]. Mortgage rates stay high because they track longer-term borrowing costs the Fed does not set directly [13]. Anyone recruiting across metros should note that home affordability is about as bad as it has been in decades, and that the forecast for national prices in the coming years is relatively flat [11][14].

Sneha Puri of Indeed Hiring Lab said the stalemate could break if companies invest in entry-level workers again instead of treating them as a cost to cut. That would lift hiring now and widen the pool of experienced workers later [7]. The forces holding hiring down sit in several budgets at once. Business Insider lists economic uncertainty tied to tariffs and the Iran war, pandemic-era overhiring and the early effects of AI adoption [5]. An aging workforce switches jobs less often, and retirements and slowing immigration have shrunk the labor force over the past year [6].

The case for permanence rests on one economist's blog post and one survey: in August, more than 100 US economists told Indeed they expected hiring demand to decline modestly over the next year [1][3]. Since hiring is already near its lowest level since the Great Recession, the central case for the next four quarters is a rate at or below today's [17]. A plan written this quarter can be budgeted against that horizon, and the entry-level line is the piece of it a single employer controls [7].

What to watch

  • The next Indeed survey of US economists: an average expectation of rising hiring demand would date this period as cyclical after all.
  • Whether the Fed follows Wednesday's increase with more, and whether longer-term borrowing costs move with it.
  • Whether a shrinking labor force starts to bind, pushing hiring up even while quits stay low.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories