Product1 publisher3 min readPublished
The Navy asks venture capital to fund the early research it used to pay for itself
Justin Fanelli, the Navy's chief technology officer, says the service is leaning on private capital to carry companies to maturity and stepping in as a buyer once the product works. He is putting a fresh priorities list in front of investors first.
The Product Desk · Product desk

What happened
- Fanelli says the Navy has replaced what he called a spaghetti chart of entry points for startups with a funnel, where companies that show strong results are pulled into the technology base as enterprise services.
- He is releasing a fresh list of what the Navy wants to buy over the next several years, and this version was vetted by a handful of venture investors he did not name before publication.
- The Navy used to fund its own early-stage research to cover the seed-through-Series-B gap, and Fanelli said it is trying to hand that job to commercial investors.
- Among recent purchases he cited, a $562 million contract was awarded this month for the MQ-25 Stingray, the autonomous refueling drone that extends the range of carrier-based fighters.
- The Navy dropped a contractor's years-delayed shipboard camera system for commercial cameras running Applied Intuition software, cutting about four years and reaching more ships than expected.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Seed and Series A defense companies lose a customer that used to pay for the research phase, so the years before Series D have to be underwritten by funds willing to carry unpriced government demand.
- decision A Series B team now has to decide whether to staff defense business development at all, or wait until the product is mature enough to be bought at the stage Fanelli says the Navy buys at.
- precedent Replacing a late program with commercial parts plus software gives program offices a schedule comparison they can cite, and makes the same substitution easier to propose on the next stalled system.
The funnel has a stage filter on the intake. "We mostly buy Series D through F type companies," Fanelli said [8]. For a founder that reorders the sequence: the product reaches maturity on private money, and the Navy arrives as a customer after it works. Fanelli said the common form of co-investment is waiting for a company to mature a product on its own before buying it, and that taking an equity stake remains rare [7].
He put the obligation for that on his own side. "The cost of that, or the responsibility, is for us, if we're not going to do it ourselves, to cast a cleaner signal," he said [10]. Investors told him the first priorities publication changed how they thought about the Navy's buying plans, and he said that is part of why he is doing it again [4].
He also gave a size for the whole of it. "We spend in the like $150 billion range every year," Fanelli said, separating that figure, total Navy purchasing, from anything as narrow as direct equity investment [5]. Most of it still flows through traditional channels [6]. This month's MQ-25 award comes to roughly 0.4 percent of the annual figure he cited [17].
One of the smaller purchases explains adoption better than the large one. Gecko Robotics took over inspection work that used to be done manually and dangerously, and Fanelli said the move drew little pushback because almost nobody wanted that job in the first place [13]. Armada's servers packed into shipping containers and Domino Data Lab's work on the Navy's machine learning pipeline sit on the same recent list [12][14].
Fanelli is both the person building the funnel and the source for how it is working. Asked whether any of the commercial technology is in use around the Strait of Hormuz, he said, "I often don't know what's classified and unclassified because I'm normally talking to people with clearances," and said he would have to check [16]. He did not say how many pilots have been promoted into enterprise services [18].
Two tests sort a defense pipeline faster than a priorities list does. The first is whether someone inside wants the current job to go away, as with the inspection work [13]. The second is whether the company can reach the stage the Navy says it buys at without Navy money [8][9]. Both yes, and the pilot is worth its cost of sale. If a company clears the first test but not the second, the funding gap belongs to the fund, because the Navy is trying to stop paying for it [9]. Fail the first and the pitch lands in a program office content with the system it already has. The camera swap worked on a program that was already years late [15].
What to watch
- Whether the new priorities list arrives with dates and dollar ranges against each line, or only categories.
- Whether Armada, Domino Data Lab or Applied Intuition turn up as funded enterprise services of record.
- Whether the Navy takes an equity position in a vendor; Fanelli said that step remains rare.