Science1 publisher2 min readPublished
Lessons on accruals shifted retail buying only when they included the calculation
A Lingnan University team randomised 4,671 Chinese and U.S. stocks into four groups and posted earnings lessons on Weibo, Xueqiu, X and Stocktwits about 19 days ahead of each announcement. Only the version with the calculation changed retail buying.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- A Lingnan University joint study examined 2,284 publicly listed Chinese stocks and 2,387 U.S. stocks, assigning its education treatment to the stocks themselves and reading the results off their prices and order flow.
- The stocks were split into four random groups, and content went out about 19 days before each earnings announcement through Weibo, Xueqiu, Guba on EASTMONEY, X and Stocktwits.
- Posting only the basic concepts of reported earnings and actual cash flows did not significantly reduce the tendency for prices to rise after an announcement and then fall back.
- Against the control group that got earnings information alone, stocks in the full education group returned about 4.2 percentage points more over the following year in China and about 3.9 points more in the United States.
- The full education also cut retail investors' buying of stocks with the widest gaps between reported earnings and cash flows, and reduced their purchases around announcements in both markets.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- capability Randomising at the level of the security, with a pre-announcement window and an attention-only control arm, makes investor education something an exchange or a broker can test for an effect size instead of reporting as participation counts.
- decision A financial-literacy budget weighted toward explainer content now has a comparison to answer to, because the component that carried the measured effect here was the calculation instructions and the accrual tooling.
- exposure Issuers whose reported earnings lean hardest on accruals face a retail bid that can be trained to discount them, and the training runs on public platforms the issuer does not control.
- precedent A top accounting journal has published a study whose treatment was information pushed into live markets at scale. The next team proposing that design has a citation for it.
An accrual is the part of reported earnings that no cash has arrived for. Earlier work, which the team took as its starting point, found that retail investors weight reported earnings too heavily, bid accrual-heavy stocks up after an announcement and then sit through the reversal [13].
Two of the four arms exist to absorb confounds. One group of stocks got nothing but a note that earnings were coming [10]. That arm removes the effect of simply drawing attention to a date. A fourth group got no posts at all [11]. The finding rests on the gap between the arm taught both the concepts and the method for calculating accruals [9] and the arm given the date alone.
The return figures need care. The 4.2 and 3.9 point differences describe the stocks' price paths over the following year against the announcement-only control [15], not the profit in any investor's account. A stock bid up less at the announcement has less to give back, and the give-back is what registers as a lower one-year return in the control arm. The team measured prices and retail buying and selling [18]; the design does not follow individual portfolios.
Reach was large in total and thin per name. More than 30 million views across the platforms [12], spread across the roughly 3,500 stocks in the three arms that received any post, is about 8,600 views per stock [20]. Each stock also had its own page on the education website the team built [6].
Contamination here works against the researchers. The same Weibo and Stocktwits audiences saw posts about treated and control stocks, and an investor who has learned to compute accruals for one company can compute them for the next, so leakage should shrink the measured difference. On that reading, the closeness of the two markets, 0.3 points apart [21], is the sturdier half of the result, because the same lesson run on two different retail populations produced nearly the same number.
The design cannot separate skill from effort. The arm with the calculation instructions and the accrual tools [9] differs from the concepts-only arm [8] in both what it taught and how much work it invited, so a reader who looked harder and a reader who analysed better are indistinguishable in the order flow. The paper, by Zhao Xiaofeng of Lingnan University with co-authors at Henan University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen [4], is in the Journal of Accounting and Economics [5], and the published summary does not report standard errors for the return differences [22].
What to watch
- Whether the reduced buying holds at the next earnings announcement once the team stops posting.
- Whether an exchange or regulator replicates the design with the accrual tool built into its own investor portal.
- Whether the effect survives in stocks where retail order flow is a small share of volume.