Product1 distinct publisher2 min readPublished
Kratos says its TDI-J85 was drawn for a weapon like this before Boeing asked. What binds the program now is a 22,500-square-foot plant in Michigan and an order book nobody has sized.
The Product Desk · Product desk

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
An engine that already exists comes with qualification data, tooling and a supplier list somebody else paid for. Kratos says the J85 was designed around applications that included a weapon like JDAM LR [6], which is a tidy way of saying it was drawn for this job before Boeing asked. The stated consequence is that Kratos scales production rather than develops a new engine [17], which keeps propulsion development off the program's critical path.
That matters more than the range figure. Three hundred nautical miles is about 556 kilometres [15], and the report's own framing is that a turbojet takes the weapon well beyond glide-based munitions [5]. Powered standoff at that distance is not the hard part here. Building small turbojets in quantity, year after year, is.
Which is where the announcement thins out. The only price attached to any of it is the $75 million Air Force award to begin acquiring the BSU-111/B Payload Delivery Unit [3]. There is no engine quantity, no unit price and no disclosed value for Kratos' role [16]. Steve Fendley, president of Kratos Unmanned Systems, says national security priorities demand affordable mass and resilient domestic supply chains [8]. Affordable mass is a claim about a rate, and no rate has been published.
The rate signals that do exist point past the current plant. Kratos calls its 22,500-square-foot Auburn Hills line operational and capable of full-rate manufacturing of its propulsion systems [7], while also buying long-lead components for a larger Spartan production run planned for 2027, spread across several customers with JDAM LR among the key intended uses [10]. So JDAM LR shares that line rather than owning it. And Auburn Hills is one part of a three-phase manufacturing infrastructure plan [11], with the company saying it wants capacity ready before new orders create immediate production pressure [12]. Today's full rate reads as a floor, and Kratos is the one saying so.
The economics run one way: volume is what pulls engine cost down [14], so the affordability case rests on order sizes nobody has stated. Kratos is spending ahead of those orders, and the timing is not its own, since the pace depends on Boeing's production schedule and future Air Force decisions [13]. Joseph Kovasity, senior vice president of Kratos TDI, frames Auburn Hills as a move beyond engine development into producing tactical propulsion at scale [9]. That claim gets settled by how many engines the Air Force pays for, not by whether the J85 flies on JDAM LR.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Kratos will build the J85 at its 22,500-square-foot propulsion manufacturing facility in Auburn Hills, Michigan, which according to Kratos has completed its transition into operational production and now supports full-rate manufacturing of the company's propulsion systems.
The engine selection puts Kratos' Auburn Hills facility on a path toward higher-rate tactical propulsion manufacturing.
Boeing has lined up a U.S.-made turbojet for its new long-range precision weapon, giving Kratos Defense & Security Solutions a production role in the JDAM LR program.
Kratos will use expanded Spartan engine capacity to supply its TDI-J85 turbojet for JDAM LR.
The JDAM LR program recently received a $75 million U.S. Air Force award to begin acquiring the BSU-111/B Payload Delivery Unit.
JDAM LR pairs a 500-pound-class payload with a range exceeding 300 nautical miles.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Single trade report relaying company statements
Every claim in the cluster traces to one article from one publisher, and its load-bearing details (facility readiness, higher volumes already underway, 2027 run, three-phase plan) are attributed to Kratos executives. There is no Boeing statement, no Air Force contract document, no test or throughput data, and no second publisher. The verifiable anchors are narrow: a named $75M Air Force award for the BSU-111/B Payload Delivery Unit and a stated payload/range envelope.
Real program selection, unsized volume
Adoption is more than an announcement of intent: a prime has selected the engine, a funded Air Force award exists on the program, a named production facility is assigned, and long-lead buying for a 2027 run has begun. But nothing quantifies it. No engine count, delivery schedule, price, or Kratos contract value appears, and the source concedes the ramp depends on Boeing's schedule and future Air Force decisions, so deployed volume today is effectively unknown.
Scale language ahead of disclosed volume
The story is told in the vocabulary of mass production - 'full-rate manufacturing', 'affordable mass', a larger 2027 run, a three-phase expansion, economies of scale - while the only number disclosed is a $75M award for a different subsystem. The underlying selection is real and the engine is genuinely pre-existing, which limits the overstatement, but the readiness and cost-curve framing outruns what is shown. Direction is positive: claims sit ahead of evidence and measured adoption.
Supplier-announcement driven
The narrative is supplied by the party that benefits from it. Kratos, a publicly traded defense supplier, has direct commercial interest in signaling prime-contractor selection, domestic sourcing credentials, and readiness to scale ahead of orders; both named speakers are Kratos executives promoting the company's own facility and roadmap. The publisher adds no adversarial sourcing, and no counterparty (Boeing, the Air Force) is quoted to test the readiness claims.
Low: one publisher, one interested source
The basic fact pattern - engine selected, plant assigned, award exists - is stated plainly and is internally consistent, so directionally the story is credible. But with one publisher, one interested primary source, no documents, and no quantities, confidence in the scale and timing dimensions is low, and several forward-looking elements cannot be tested at all.
product
The Air Force's JASSM bet: a second engine source beats a better engine1 distinct publisher
invest
Code Metal's $80M WarMatrix award shows OTA is where defense revenue now shows up1 distinct publisher
product
The Valkyrie's real test was the control handoff, not the flight1 distinct publisher
product
The Air Force just published its shopping list of threat signatures it wants to shoot at cheaply1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 24, 2026