Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished Updated

Code Metal's $80M WarMatrix award shows OTA is where defense revenue now shows up

A $17 million first tranche became an $80 million agreement in under 12 months, awarded under Other Transaction Authority rather than the traditional procurement cycle.

The Investor · Invest desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Code Metal's $80M WarMatrix award shows OTA is where defense revenue now shows up
Photo: fortune.com

What happened

  • Boston-based Code Metal landed an $80 million contract to modernize and AI-enable WarMatrix, the Department of War's wargaming simulation environment; Fortune reported the deal exclusively.
  • The process took less than 12 months.
  • CEO Peter Morales said that after securing $17 million for the initial operating capability, the minimum version of the system that can be usefully deployed, the company received the full funding as an Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreement.
  • Morales said: "I have never seen them move this fast, and that's been really exciting."
  • Code Metal builds AI-powered software to translate code across programming languages and verify that it works on different types of hardware.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

Code Metal, a Boston software firm, has been awarded $80 million to modernize and AI-enable WarMatrix, the Department of War's wargaming simulation environment, according to Fortune, which reported the deal exclusively [1]. The interesting part is not the headline number but the mechanism and the clock: the company first secured $17 million for an initial operating capability, then received full funding as an Other Transaction Authority agreement, with the process taking under 12 months [3][2].

That is a step-up of roughly 4.7 times the first tranche [1], and it happened inside a year in a system where proposals have historically taken years to turn into cash [19]. "I have never seen them move this fast, and that's been really exciting," chief executive Peter Morales told Fortune [4]. Read that as a statement about instrument choice. An OTA does not run the standard competitive acquisition gauntlet, which is why it has become the practical route for software companies that would otherwise be dead on arrival against the incumbent proposal machine.

The scope is narrower than "AI wargaming" suggests, and Morales is explicit about it. Code Metal's product translates code across programming languages and verifies that it runs on different hardware [5]. WarMatrix helps planners run wargaming and analysis, and the work is expected to let analyses that once took months finish in days [7]. "We're not replacing decades of validated code," Morales said. "We're really making it reachable to the warfighter and to AI" [8]. Wrapping validated legacy software rather than rewriting it is the cheaper technical bet and the easier one to sell to a customer that owns the legacy.

The commercial shape is worth reading carefully. Code Metal employs 123 people [14], which puts this single award at about $650,000 per head [2], and roughly 75% of its business is already defense-related [9]. It was valued at $1.25 billion in February on a $125 million Series B led by Salesforce Ventures [6], so the award is about 6% of that mark [4]. Concentration that high makes the follow-on the whole story, and the company appears to know it: Ryan Aytay, formerly Salesforce's chief business officer and Tableau's CEO, joined earlier this year as president and COO [15], with the stated challenge being to convert one-off opportunities into repeatable, expandable business [16]. Its route to that is partly through the primes, not around them; Code Metal has worked with the U.S. Air Force, Raytheon, L3Harris and Boeing, and Morales describes the primes as partners and clients [10].

Context on how crowded this trade has become: roughly 10,000 new defense companies entered the market over the past two years, per a Center for Strategic and International Studies analysis [11], and venture investors put a record $19.8 billion into defense tech across 262 deals in the first quarter of 2026 [12], an average of about $76 million per deal [3]. Against that, the Wall Street Journal reported that Pentagon contract spending on the 15 highest-valued defense-tech startups tripled last fiscal year from 2022 while still amounting to less than 1% of total defense contractor dollars [13].

Watch whether the OTA converts into a funded follow-on rather than ending at full operating capability, whether the months-to-days claim survives contact with actual planners, and whether that sub-1% share moves in the next spending cycle. Speed of award is not the same as durability of revenue.

Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories