Invest2 distinct publishers3 min readUpdated
The exchange promised proof of reserves on May 23 and has not delivered it. Its founder now says he will take his own staff's unpaid-wage claims to the police.
The Investor · Invest desk

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
BitMart said on July 26 that it would stop taking new deposits, sign-ups and orders that day at 01:30 UTC, and it has described what follows as an "orderly" shutdown [1][25]. Weeks later, its founder says he intends to report his own employees' unpaid-wage claims to law enforcement, and the proof of reserves the exchange promised on May 23 still has not appeared [12][6][7].
The mechanics are fixed. Spot and futures trading stop on August 26, 2026 at 01:00 UTC [3]. Users have been told to finish verification and withdraw by 05:00 UTC that day, with the caveat that some requests may attract additional compliance checks [5]. Operations formally end on January 31, 2027 at 15:59 UTC, after which customers get limited account access [4]. That leaves 158 days between the last trade and the last day [23], and, per the Bitcoin Foundation's July 27 breakdown, no disclosed time frame for withdrawals once operations cease and no bankruptcy filing [17].
The gap between the language and the ledger is where counterparties live. On May 23, BitMart attributed withdrawal problems to a volume-farming scheme across 239 connected accounts and said it would publish proof of reserves "at an appropriate time" [6]. That was 86 days before the August 17 post from an account operating under the name BitMart_zh, which tagged co-founder Sheldon and the official exchange account and claimed users still could not retrieve funds while many employees had not received their final month's pay [8][11]. On August 8, Xia said the company had not run away, told users to be careful about screenshots and leaks from current and former employees, and said the core team was working through an asset inventory and system maintenance [9]. He also denied any misappropriation of client funds [10][15]. Cryptobriefing reports he now plans police involvement and data forensics [12], which the publication reads as a review of internal communications, access logs and possibly transaction records [24], and which it calls unusual, since unpaid wages in most wind-downs are a liability a company acknowledges and negotiates [13].
Third parties have been less rhetorical. Whale Alert reported on August 10 that a co-founder of OpenGradient said his market-making team could not withdraw from BitMart and questioned whether the exchange was solvent; BitMart maintains withdrawals are still being processed [14][15]. A Hungarian firm has lodged a police complaint over roughly $80,000 in frozen assets, according to Cryptobriefing [16]. The same report puts the queue at more than 300 users an hour submitting withdrawal requests, which works out to more than 7,200 a day if that rate holds [21][22].
The comparison rivals are drawing is deliberate. MEXC announced a Hacken proof-of-reserves audit on August 14 showing reserve ratios above 100% across main assets and 288% for Bitcoin, and framed the disclosure against a continuing trend of exchange consolidation in 2026 [18]. BitMart carries history into this: the December 2021 hot wallet breach cost an estimated $150 million to $196 million, and Xia's pledge to compensate users helped the platform survive [19]. A venue founded in 2017, live since 2018, built on altcoin listings that larger platforms would not touch, is precisely the tier where the adjective and the audit part company [20][2].
Three things to watch. Whether any proof of reserves is published before the 05:00 UTC August 26 withdrawal cut-off [5][7]. Whether BitMart attaches a date to withdrawals in the 158-day window between the trading halt and formal closure [17][23]. And whether the Hungarian complaint or the founder's own police referral produces a filing that moves the asset inventory onto a record someone other than BitMart controls [16][12].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
On July 26 BitMart announced it would stop accepting new deposits, sign-ups or orders on that date at 01:30 UTC; the exchange announced its wind-down on July 26.
BitMart is registered in the Cayman Islands and halted new user registrations immediately when it announced the shutdown.
All futures and spot trading is expected to end on August 26, 2026 at 01:00 UTC.
BitMart will close its operations officially on January 31, 2027 at 15:59 UTC, after which customers will have limited access to their accounts.
On August 8, Sheldon said the company had not "run away" and would not, advised users to be careful about screenshots and leaks from present and former employees, and said the core team was working on an inventory of assets and system maintenance before the next step of an "orderly" shutdown.
On August 8, Sheldon Xia publicly denied any misappropriation of funds, stating that his core team is conducting an asset inventory and processing withdrawal requests.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Documented timeline, undocumented balance sheet
The verifiable spine is strong: both publishers report the same dated shutdown milestones with UTC precision, and one quotes the August 17 public post directly. But the load-bearing solvency questions rest on second-hand or unsourced material — a Whale Alert relay of an OpenGradient co-founder, an aggregated report of Xia's police plan, and an unsourced 300-requests-per-hour figure — while the one artifact that would settle the matter, the promised proof of reserves, does not exist publicly. No filings, balances, user counts or aggregate frozen-fund totals appear anywhere in the cluster.
Wind-down demonstrably underway, scale undisclosed
Real-world events are observable rather than announced-only: registrations and order flow have already stopped, the trading halt is dated, users and a market-making team report failed withdrawals, staff have gone public, a foreign firm filed a police complaint, and a rival exchange has published an audited reserve ratio in response. What is missing is magnitude — how many accounts, how much value, and how much of the withdrawal queue clears — so the footprint is confirmed but unquantified.
Company's 'orderly' framing outruns what it has shown
The overstatement here is the subject's, not the publishers'. BitMart and Xia describe an 'orderly' and non-abandoning wind-down and insist withdrawals are processing, while the promised reserves proof is 86 days overdue, users and a market-making team report they cannot withdraw, employees allege unpaid final wages, and no post-closure withdrawal window has been disclosed. Both publishers largely stay inside sourced facts; Cryptobriefing leans further, adding an interpretive read on the police escalation and an unsourced throughput figure, which nudges the gap up rather than down.
Narrative control on all sides
Every voice in the cluster has a stake. Xia is managing solvency perception during a wind-down, warned users about employee leaks on August 8, and is reportedly moving to police and forensics against staff who raised wage claims — narrative-control incentives Cryptobriefing names explicitly. MEXC's Hacken audit is competitive marketing timed to a rival's trust collapse, and Cryptopolitan frames it as rivals seizing the moment while running a newsletter promotion in-page. Cryptobriefing republishes altcoinsbox material, adding an aggregation layer with limited independent verification.
Facts of the shutdown solid, the solvency question open
Confidence is high on the schedule, the failure to publish reserves, the public wage dispute and the competitive PoR contrast — these are consistently reported by two publishers on the same day. It is much lower on the questions that matter most: whether user funds are intact, how large the shortfall (if any) is, whether the police referral proceeds, and whether the 300-per-hour withdrawal rate is real. With only two crypto trade outlets, one of them an aggregator, and no primary filings or audited figures, the story's core uncertainty remains unresolved.
invest
ABFinance had the US licences and folded before it ever launched1 distinct publisher
invest
The growth market on crypto venues is SK Hynix, not tokens1 distinct publisher
invest
Copilot built the fake Ledger app. A human still only made 20 lookups in two weeks.1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
cryptobriefing.com
1 article · August 17, 2026
cryptopolitan.com
1 article · August 17, 2026