Skip to content

Invest3 publishers3 min readPublished

Bitcoin enters its quarterly close about 4% below what US spot-ETF holders paid on average

Bitcoin fell to $82,568 on Monday, about 4% under the $86,000 average cost of US spot-ETF holders, two days before its September and third-quarter closes. Corporate treasuries paid $80,500 on average, so Wednesday's close sets whether each group ends the quarter in profit or underwater.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying Bitcoin enters its quarterly close about 4% below what US spot-ETF holders paid on average

What happened

  • About $30 million of sell orders clustered near $85,700 on Monday, according to CoinGlass data, and the price fell faster once they appeared.
  • US spot bitcoin ETFs took in about $2.4 billion in the week to Sept. 25, their biggest week since the one ended Oct. 10, 2025.
  • Bitcoin is up just over 40% for the quarter, its best third quarter since 2017, against an average third-quarter gain of 8.6% since 2013.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • exposure The average ETF holder was already 1.8% underwater at Sunday's $84,450 weekly close, so any quarterly close inside the band puts that paper loss on quarter-end statements.
  • constraint Getting the ETF cohort back to break-even means clearing the $85,700 ask cluster that turned Monday's move, only $300 below the $86,000 line.
  • contradiction Galvin calls the pullback expected after strong gains, while Kibar warns hesitant trading can send the price back into a range that tops out $500 below the treasuries' basis.

An aggregate cost basis is an average, and the $86,000 that Cointelegraph gives for US spot-ETF holders mixes buyers who have had very different years [5]. The week to Oct. 10, 2025 brought in more than $2.7 billion, around the time bitcoin set its record above $126,000 [12][13]. A coin bought at that record is worth about 34% less at Monday's low [5]. The funds then lost more than $5 billion to net outflows through July before reversing, and they are now close to $1 billion of net inflows for 2026, a swing of roughly $6 billion [14][6]. A buyer on Aug. 19 paid roughly $65,000 and is up about 28% [15][7]. Last week's buyers paid prices that briefly topped $87,000 [21].

The band between the two published break-evens is $5,500 wide, about 6.7% of Monday's low [8]. Getting back to the ETF figure takes a 4.2% gain from that low [1]. Falling to the treasury figure takes a 2.5% drop [2]. Sunday's weekly close of $84,450 was already $1,550, or 1.8%, under the ETF number [2][3]. Buyers from the past one to four weeks hold a $78,300 basis, according to CryptoQuant data cited by Cointelegraph [7].

The ETF line sits $300 above the $30 million of asks that CoinGlass data showed clustered around $85,700 on Monday, the level where the price turned lower [4][3]. That order-book wall was about one-eightieth of the $2.4 billion the ETFs took in the week before [9][12]. The drop liquidated about $70 million of long positions over 24 hours, according to CoinGlass data cited by Cointelegraph [18].

Wednesday's close can land in one of three places. Above $86,000, the average ETF holder ends the quarter in profit, but the price has to clear $85,700 on the same day as the August PCE print, expected at 3.6% year on year [9]. Between the two lines, the result matches Sunday: ETF holders underwater in aggregate, treasuries ahead [2][5][6]. Below $80,500, both groups are underwater and the price is within $500 of the $60,000-to-$80,000 range where it traded for much of 2026 [6][17]. "Hesitant price action here can result in price returning inside the range," trader Aksel Kibar wrote on X [17].

I'd expect the middle outcome. The Fed raised rates by 0.25% in September, and CME FedWatch odds of another hike in October rose from 57.7% to 70.3% in a week [20][10]. WTI crude is back at $95 after President Donald Trump rejected Iran's latest ceasefire proposal [19]. The case against is the flow data, with the ETFs now positive for the year [14]. "I don't think the rally lacks conviction just based on weakness over the last few days, which would be expected at some point given the strength of late," said Richard Galvin, executive chairman of DACM [16]. A Wednesday close above $86,000 would prove the view wrong. September payrolls, estimated at 83,000 jobs, arrive on Friday, two days after the quarter has already printed [11][4].

What to watch

  • Where Wednesday's September and third-quarter close lands relative to the $86,000 ETF basis and the $80,500 treasury basis.
  • August PCE on Wednesday against the 3.6% year-on-year forecast, and whether October hike odds move off 70.3%.
  • Whether ETF flows after the $2.4 billion week hold 2026 net inflows near $1 billion or tip back toward outflows.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories