Science2 publishers3 min readPublished
Joint analysis of 103 bat genomes and 44 fossils places bat origins in Europe
The Bat1K consortium's Nature paper samples every one of the 21 recognised bat families and dates the group to roughly 65 million years ago, with the geography resting on where 44 fossil bats were found.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- A Nature paper published on Sept. 23 by 137 researchers from 64 countries, working as the Bat1K consortium, combined bat genomic and fossil evidence in a single analysis.
- The reconstruction places the origin of bats, and of mammalian flight, in Europe around 65 million years ago, overturning earlier hypotheses of Asian, African or North American origins.
- The earliest descendants dispersed into Africa, forming a Europe-Africa hub from which bats later expanded into Asia, the Americas and Australia.
- The genomic dataset covers 103 species, one or more from each of the 21 currently recognised bat families, and is the largest collection of high-quality bat genomes assembled so far.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- capability Comparative work on bat lifespan and immunity now has a tree with every family on it, so a candidate gene found in one species can be tested against the rest before anyone calls it an adaptation.
- constraint The European root is inferred from 44 fossils, which ties the result to the accidents of where fossil bats have been excavated more tightly than the 103 genomes suggest.
- precedent If the joint fossil-and-genome dating that Davalos describes holds up under scrutiny, origin debates in other groups will be expected to run the same analysis.
- decision Researchers studying the evolution of echolocation no longer have a long flying, non-echolocating phase to work with, and have to account for both traits appearing near the root.
A 103-species set is thin against more than 1,500 living bat species, about 6.9 percent of them [9]. The coverage that counts here sits at a different level: the collection includes representatives of every one of the 21 currently recognised bat families [6]. Every deep branch of the tree therefore has a sequenced genome on it, which is what a dating analysis needs. Variation within a family is sampled far more sparsely, and that is not the question this dataset was built to answer.
The geography leans on the fossils. The team modelled 44 fossil bats from around the world together with the living species in a single analysis [7]. Liliana M. Davalos of Stony Brook University, a senior author, said the approach "can do what other methods cannot: identify the oldest group of fossil bats while taking the genomic data into account, and uncover when and where bats originated" [11]. A root placed this way depends on where fossil bats have been dug up, and the phys.org report does not give the uncertainty on the 65-million-year estimate. Samples behind the genomes were collected over decades, including from the rarest and most unusual bat families in remote locations [17].
Vielasia falls within the oldest branch of the revised tree, which puts echolocation before the diversification of modern bats [13]. The authors take that to mean echolocation and powered flight were both established near the origin of the group [14]. Bats are the only mammals capable of true powered flight, and most of them orient and hunt in darkness using sound alone [18], so a tree that separates those two traits in time would have implied a long stretch of flying, non-echolocating bats. On this tree they arrive together.
"Bats constantly surprise us. They are one of evolution's greatest experiments," said Sonja Vernes of the University of St Andrews, senior author and director of Bat1K [12].
Many bat species resist disease well and live exceptionally long lives for their size [15], and the study's own framing is that the genomic resource provides the first robust evolutionary framework for investigating the genes behind those traits, with possible relevance to human research on aging and immunity [16]. The framework is where the paper stops. Identifying a gene, showing it changes lifespan, and showing the same pathway operates in a mammal that does not fly are three separate pieces of work, none of them in this paper. The dataset does change the control: a comparison that finds an unusual immune gene in one bat species can now be checked against 20 other families before anyone calls it a bat adaptation [6].
The team also revised the bat evolutionary tree using new methods, settling several long-running arguments about how the major groups relate to one another [10].
What to watch
- Paleocene bat fossils from Asia, Africa or the Americas would test the European root directly by adding to the 44 fossils in the model.
- The credibility intervals in the Nature paper itself, which will show how much of the origin date and location the data pins down.
- Follow-up work that uses the 103-genome set to nominate specific longevity or immunity genes.