Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

Washington steps back on BNPL, so Brussels now sets the underwriting floor

The CFPB dropped its rule treating buy now/pay later like credit cards. EU affordability checks bite in November, and any US provider selling into Europe inherits them anyway.

The Investor · Invest desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened

  • The CFPB did an about-face on its 2024-issued rule that would have treated BNPL products like credit cards, leaving states to step into the regulatory ring.
  • The Trump administration has taken a light approach to regulating buy now/pay later lending.
  • In Europe, the Consumer Credit Directive 2 (CCD2) expands EU consumer credit regulations to include BNPL services, which had been largely exempt. It was adopted in 2023 and is in the implementation stage, with full compliance required by November. The rules classify BNPL as consumer credit, require mandatory affordability checks, and impose strict disclosure requirements.
  • What is happening around the world with respect to BNPL gains importance as US-based players like Amazon and PayPal are emerging to a greater extent in foreign markets.
  • The U.K. has also tightened consumer protections related to BNPL.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reversed course on its 2024 rule that would have treated buy now/pay later products like credit cards, leaving individual states to step into the gap [1], and the Trump administration has taken a light approach to supervising the sector [2]. In the same window, the European Union's second Consumer Credit Directive pulls BNPL into consumer credit law with mandatory affordability checks and strict disclosure requirements, with full compliance required by November [3].

That divergence matters less than it looks, because a compliance build does not stop at a border. American Banker reports that US-based players including Amazon and PayPal are appearing to a greater extent in foreign markets [4], and the UK has also tightened its BNPL consumer protections [5]. Nick Maynard of Juniper Research told American Banker the market "is only going to get more competitive and you'll see bigger brands get increasingly involved" [6]. Bigger brands are precisely the firms with multi-market exposure and the least appetite for maintaining two underwriting standards.

The forecasts explain why no one is walking away from Europe to preserve a looser US model. Juniper's 2024 study projected BNPL users would grow 107% by 2028 from 380 million in 2024 [7], which works out to roughly 787 million [8]. Juniper expects US digital BNPL transaction value to grow 77.1% between 2026 and 2031, and European value 71.5% over the same period [9] - a gap of 5.6 percentage points [10]. That is not a spread that justifies treating the EU as a side market with its own rulebook.

Ticket size pushes the same direction, independent of any regulator. The CFPB reported in December 2025 that the average BNPL transaction was $135 in 2023, the most recent year available [11]. Brian Riley of Javelin Strategy & Research told American Banker that "as you start scaling up, you need to invoke good credit judgment on the account" [12]. Larger baskets turn a convenience product into a credit book.

Banks are the quiet beneficiaries. Robert Kilpatrick of Datos Insights said fintech BNPL providers historically held an edge over banks because they were not required to run stringent creditworthiness checks, and that the new rules will force all providers to operate more in line with how banks traditionally do [13]. Required transparency on late fees also helps level the field, he added [14]. His colleague Daniel Dawson said nonbank players could lose some of those advantages under the new European and UK regimes [15]. EY's John Radecki made the parallel point about scale: if a national US regulator did step in, it "could benefit some operators, potentially those that are larger scale and have the ability to act at scale" [16]. Read that as incumbents with existing credit infrastructure.

Watch the November EU deadline, and then watch whether US-facing underwriting quietly converges on the European standard rather than staying looser at home. Radecki said the European and UK experience will be "very instructive" to US operators [17], and flagged a possible shift after Trump leaves office, either through legislation or a next administration that places higher priority on BNPL consumer protection [18]. In the meantime, state rulemaking is where American supervision actually sits [1], which means the practical floor for a cross-border provider is set in Brussels and London, not Washington.

Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories