Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished
Half of S&P 500 stocks sit at least 16% below their highs as the 10-year yield reaches 5.27%
Goldman Sachs says half of S&P 500 members sit 16% or more below their 52-week highs while the index is about 1% off its record. The gap points to a few heavily weighted AI stocks carrying the index as Treasury and European bond yields keep climbing.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- The 10-year Treasury yield rose as high as 5.27% intraday on the 28th, its highest since June 2007, with the two-year at 4.96% and the 30-year at 5.55%.
- Britain's 10-year gilt yield reached 5.44%, its highest since 2007, and French and Italian yields hit multi-year highs as the Treasury selloff spread.
- Axios found that 66 of the 72 basis points the five-year Treasury yield added in a month came from real yields, with inflation expectations up just 6.
- State Street's analysis of FactSet and S&P data put projected S&P 500 earnings-per-share growth for this year above 30%, nearly double January's roughly 15%.
- Bank of America said the 10-year yield would have to approach 7% before equity investors turn, a level last reached in July 1996.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint With the forward earnings yield level with the 10-year, stocks have no valuation cushion against higher rates, so further index gains have to come from rising earnings forecasts.
- cost Returns measured at the index level overstate what a typical S&P 500 stock has done, because the median member has already given up 16% from its high.
- contradiction Axios's split points to growth as the cause of higher yields, against the oil-inflation account; if it holds, yields have less reason to fall while jobless claims sit near 57-year lows.
Goldman says a 16% median drawdown from 52-week highs is similar to the bubble era of the early 2000s [10]. For the median stock to be that far down while the index is within a point of its record [10], the largest weights have to be close to their own highs. The source attributes this to large AI-related stocks with heavy weightings [11]. It does not name them or give their combined share of the index.
The multiple has already fallen. The 12-month forward P/E is 19, down from 23 a year earlier [12], so a buyer pays about 17% less for each dollar of expected earnings [2]. The index set its record in mid-August and sits about 1.5% under it by the source's own figure (Goldman's is 1%) [3][10], so it is at worst 1.5% below where it stood a year ago. Put that beside the lower multiple and forward earnings must be at least about 19% higher than a year earlier [3], consistent with State Street's 30%-plus growth forecast for this year [7]. Investors have not sold [3]. The forward earnings yield is about 5.26%, one over 19 [4], against a 10-year that touched 5.27% [1].
Axios's decomposition puts about 92% of the past month's five-year move in real yields [1]. The source notes that this sits somewhat at odds with the account of oil-driven inflation worries pushing Treasury yields up [5]. Axios links the real-rate rise to jobless claims at a 57-year low and to large-scale corporate investment centered on AI [6]. The prevailing view reported in the source is that the same investment is the main driver of corporate results [8].
The outcomes split three ways. Should earnings at the lagging half of the index start rising toward that forecast, breadth repairs itself with yields still above 5%. On the rates path, Bank of America's 7% threshold [9] sits 1.73 points above the intraday high [5]. A slowdown in AI investment would probably ease real yields, and it would also remove the earnings growth behind the stocks holding up the index [6][11].
I think the third outcome is the one the index is least prepared for. The median stock has already absorbed its 16% [10]. The heaviest weights carry an earnings outlook tied to the AI spending that Axios says is pushing real rates up [6][11]. A change in that spending would move the discount rate and the earnings being discounted at the same time. Bank of America's 7% figure is the counter-thesis: on its reading, a 10-year in the 5% range is well short of the level at which equity investors turn [9].
What to watch
- Goldman's median drawdown figure: a narrowing from 16% while the 10-year holds above 5% would show the breadth concern was wrong.
- The five-year breakeven: if inflation expectations start supplying most of the yield rise, Axios's growth explanation no longer holds.
- Revisions to the 30%-plus earnings-per-share growth forecast, and whether they come from AI-linked companies or from the lagging half of the index.