Leadership1 publisher2 min readPublished
AI prompting is exposing some Gen Z workers' weak typing skills
Young people who write AI prompts are drilling their typing, Business Insider reports, with one 23-year-old reaching 170 words per minute. The reporting is anecdotal, but it is enough to stop managers assuming younger hires arrive able to type.
The Board Room · Leadership desk
What happened
- Julia Andrusiak, 26, works in an AI-focused job that sometimes calls for strong prompts, but she still types slowly and dictates her longer prompts.
- Andreas Francazi, who has taught typing to 15- to 30-year-olds in Vienna for a decade, says his students' skills have deteriorated over that time.
- The Wall Street Journal reported in 2024 that digital natives were baffling teachers and parents with their lack of typing skills.
- BYOK, a distraction-free digital typewriter maker, gets about 10% of its orders from educators, according to founder Nick Sjolinder.
Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- decision A hire's birth year tells a manager little about keyboard skill, so roles built around long prompts justify a short typing check when new staff start.
- constraint Open-plan offices limit the voice workaround. A slow typist is left choosing between dictating self-consciously in front of colleagues and writing shorter prompts.
- precedent Francazi's newer students grew up without physical computers, so later cohorts reaching entry-level jobs are likely to arrive with less keyboard practice than today's hires.
The argument that prompting rewards typing rests on one claim in the Business Insider piece. AI is only as good as the prompt it is given, and rambling voice prompts can be insufficiently clear and precise [5]. Gerasimov describes the effect as a matter of willingness: a fast typist writes the longer, fuller prompt because it costs him little. "You're going to be a lot more comfortable actually giving your full thoughts and ideas if you know that, hey, doing this is only going to take a minute," he said [7].
The counterargument comes from the same cohort. Andrusiak said one of her friends put it this way: "Well, you don't really have to type the whole page. You can just give it short sentences. It's not really that tiring." [14] For quick tasks the friend is probably right. Andrusiak's objection is about what the short version hands over. "But then I feel like it's outsourcing too much of cognitive power to a technology," she said [13].
The board-deck version of onboarding assumes that people raised on screens arrive fluent at keyboards. That assumption is incomplete. Francazi says his newer students did not grow up around physical computers, are much less familiar with keyboards than earlier typists, and often arrive typing rapidly with two fingers, so he starts them on the basics [9]. Andrusiak got to college typing that way, loudly enough that a professor kept pausing his lecture [2]. "It was the first moment I realized that I may not be the best at this," she said [3].
The evidence is thin and should be weighed that way. It is one feature built on a handful of named people, and the article does not measure output or time lost at work. Tarun Krishnamurthi, a sophomore at San Diego State University, said slow typing could worsen workers' output and that "typing could be a big bottleneck" [12]. He is 18 and still in college. The spread of skill inside one generation is wide all the same. Gerasimov never took a typing class and got fast through video game chats [6], while Krishnamurthi began practicing in middle school for fun [15].
For a manager, the trade-off is training hours now against accommodation later. Training is cheap to try. Francazi says students of all ages become entranced by a three-minute typing test [10]. Accepting dictation looks free at first, but it commits the team to quiet space [1] and to extra review of prompts that come out loose [5]. A team that trains nobody this quarter will have chosen that path by next quarter without ever deciding it.
What to watch
- An employer or researcher measuring prompt quality or output against typing speed would turn these anecdotes into evidence in one direction or the other.
- Speech-to-text tools that reliably turn rambling dictation into tight prompts would weaken the case for training typists at work.
- Schools adding keyboarding instruction back into curricula would shrink the gap before the next cohort reaches the workforce.