Science1 publisher2 min readPublished
A review of 22 flush studies puts aerosols in the adult breathing zone for over 20 seconds
Flinders University researchers pooled 22 air-sampling studies of toilet flushing and found aerosol concentration tracked flush volume and the load in the bowl, while the data on closing the lid stayed too thin to settle the question.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- A Flinders University team led by environmental health Ph.D. student Lira Adiyani pooled 22 air-sampling studies of toilet flushing, publishing the systematic review in Science of the Total Environment.
- Across those studies, aerosols were detected as far as 150 centimetres from the fixture and stayed airborne for more than 20 seconds, with the densest readings close to the bowl and near seat height.
- Aerosol concentration rose both with larger flush volumes and with heavier seeding of the bowl, which the authors read as generation being driven by bowl contents and flush intensity.
- The authors could not draw a significant conclusion on whether closing the lid helps, because the available data on that question was limited, and Adiyani recommended closing it anyway.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint The review's outcome measure is concentration in air samples, so it cannot tell a facilities manager how much a lower-flush fixture changes anyone's odds of catching something.
- decision Flush volume is the only item on the mitigation list settled at purchase; cleaning and ventilation are recurring obligations for whoever runs the building.
- contradiction The pooled data could not support a verdict on lids while the lead author recommends closing them, and the recommendation is the half that will travel.
- exposure Younger children are named as more at risk of inhaling these aerosols, so the flagged exposure sits with occupants who choose neither the fixture nor its flush volume.
Flushing creates turbulence, and the turbulence throws particles out of the bowl into the room [13]. Each one measures nanometres to micrometres across, usually invisible, and small enough to reach deep into the respiratory tract once inhaled [13][14]. What they carry is whatever was deposited in the bowl plus whatever was living in the water itself [14].
Eleven of the 22 pooled studies seeded the bowl on purpose with viruses, bacteria or fluorescent surrogates; the other eleven sampled under unseeded conditions [5][22]. The pool also mixes seated pans, squat pans and urinals at a range of flush volumes [6], and concentrations varied significantly from one study to the next [9]. The flush-volume association is drawn across that mix. In my view it is still the most useful number in the paper, because flush volume is the one variable a building owner selects, with the condition that the same review found bowl seeding tracking concentration just as clearly [8].
The tallest detection, 163 centimetres above floor level, comes from a single study, about 4.5 percent of the included literature [11][21]. That is a maximum someone measured, not a central estimate. The suspension time is given as over 20 seconds, which is a lower bound [7].
Air-sample data and reported aerosol and bioaerosol concentrations were conditions for a study to enter the review [4]. Illness was not one of them. The link from bioaerosols to infections, coronaviruses among them, comes from separate work in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health [15].
On lids, the authors suggest a closed one may influence dispersal and reduce the number of aerosols at breathing height [18]. Adiyani went further in a statement. On the available evidence, she said, she would recommend closing the toilet lid before flushing where a lid is available, as a precaution to minimize potential inhalation exposure, while noting that "it does not completely prevent aerosols from escaping" [19].
The team says the review highlights important gaps in current research, and that working out where and how aerosols are distributed after flushing could inform safer toilet designs [16]. It also says the dispersal cannot be eliminated entirely [12]. The practical list the researchers offer is regular cleaning, adequate ventilation from an exhaust fan or an open window, and selecting a model with lower flush volumes when possible [17].
What to watch
- A study that varies flush volume on one fixture with the bowl load held constant would turn the review's association into a specification.
- Paired air sampling with the lid up and down on the same toilet would settle the precaution the pooled data could not.
- Work that tracks infections among users, not only concentrations in air, would connect these measurements to disease risk.