Science5 distinct publishers3 min readUpdated
S301 skims Sagittarius A* at about 8 percent of light speed. That proximity gives the GRAVITY+ team a direct spin measurement inside ten years, instead of decades of indirect modelling.
The Scientist · Science desk

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
A star that laps the Milky Way's central black hole every 8.7 years and reaches roughly 25,000 kilometres per second at closest approach was reported on Aug. 19 in Nature [1][2][4]. The consequence is a timetable rather than a spectacle: the orbit passes close enough to register the black hole dragging spacetime around with it, and the team says the spin of Sagittarius A* should be measurable within about ten years [9][12].
Live Science renders that peak speed as about 55 million mph, or 90 million km/h [3]. Speed is the headline; distance is the physics. S301 comes within about 12 times the Earth-Sun distance of the black hole, roughly 1.7 billion kilometres, a little beyond Saturn's orbit [5][6] and around ten times closer than S2 ever gets [7].
S2 has been the workhorse: a 16-year orbit, tracked since 1992 through more than two full laps, which yielded two general-relativistic signatures, the star's light losing energy climbing out of the gravity well and the slow turning of its ellipse known as Schwarzschild precession [13]. Both depend only on mass [14], quoted as about 4 million solar masses, or 4.3 million in Live Science's account [27]. Rotation is the other property, and the frame-dragging it produces falls off steeply with distance, so it needs a star that dives much closer than S2 [12]. On S301 the Schwarzschild precession is already conspicuous, swinging the ellipse by roughly 2 degrees per orbit [15]. According to the study team, it is the first known star usable for a direct measurement of a black hole's rotation [8]. Stefan Gillessen of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics calls that a key test of Einstein's theory [10]; co-author Juan Osorno of LIRA, Observatoire de Paris-PSL, says that without S301 the alternative was several more decades of tracking other stars [11].
That matters because the existing spin measurements are inferences. Spin can be read from X-rays emitted by gas near some black holes and from gravitational waves in mergers, but both require modelling and assumptions that leave the results contested [24]. Christopher Reynolds of the University of Maryland calls them good but indirect measures, and says the star offers a much more direct one [25]. Spin is also a growth history: fast spin implies steady accretion, slow spin a more chaotic diet, and spin is thought to shape jets and winds [26].
The observing burden is real. S301 appears about 2 billion times fainter than Betelgeuse [18], and the detection required the GRAVITY instrument, now GRAVITY+, on ESO's Very Large Telescope Interferometer at Paranal, which combines four 8-metre telescopes for 15 times the resolution of one; principal investigator Frank Eisenhauer says no other observatory can do it [17]. The star first appeared in spring 2023 as a faint smudge, and archival data from 2021 and 2017 filled in 19 positions across eight years that close a full ellipse [19]. It looks like an ordinary main-sequence star of about 1.5 solar masses, compact enough to survive the tides [22]; since stars cannot form that close in, the team proposes it was half of a binary torn apart, with the companion flung out as a hypervelocity star [23][31].
S301's last perihelion was in early 2023 [20], which puts the next one around late 2031 [21] - inside the ten-year window. Watch also the fifth-force constraint: co-author Felix Mang says only an upper limit has been derived so far, and it keeps dropping [29].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
S301 completes one orbit of Sagittarius A* every 8.7 years.
At its closest passage S301 travels at around 25,000 kilometres per second, more than 8 percent of the speed of light, making it the fastest known star in the Milky Way.
Live Science describes S301's perihelion speed as roughly 55 million mph (90 million km/h), about 8 percent of the speed of light.
The discovery was reported Aug. 19 in the journal Nature.
S301 approaches Sagittarius A* to about 12 times the Earth-Sun distance, roughly the distance from Saturn to the Sun, closer than any other star observed so far.
S301's closest approach brings it just 1.7 billion kilometres from Sagittarius A*, a bit farther than the Saturn-Sun distance.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Peer-reviewed orbit, disputed forecast
The orbital facts rest on a Nature paper and a closed astrometric ellipse from 19 positions over eight years, consistently reported across four independent outlets, with Schwarzschild precession already measured at ~2 degrees per lap. The headline payoff - a direct spin measurement - is a projection from team simulations, and one source documents an unresolved orbital degeneracy while another documents outside scepticism, so the evidence is strong for the discovery and thinner for the promise.
One instrument, campaign just starting
Real deployment exists - an upgraded GRAVITY+ on the VLTI has produced eight years of usable positions and a published orbit - but the programme that would deliver the spin measurement is at its beginning: a single facility that the PI says has no worldwide substitute, a follow-up instrument (MICADO on the ELT) still described as upcoming, and the decisive perihelion not until 2031.
Payoff framed more firmly than caveats allow
Most coverage presents 'spin within ten years' as a schedule, while the supplied material shows it depends on assumptions the releases omit: the study assumes a spin near the maximum, success also needs the spin pointed favourably, current data admit two mirror-image orbits, and one outside astrophysicist expects the answer to require multiple datasets rather than this star alone. The underlying discovery is not overstated, so the gap is modest and positive.
Institutional promotion, partly offset by outside voices
The most detailed source is a release-style account carrying only MPE and collaboration quotes, including a claim of worldwide facility uniqueness and an explicit case for future ELT/MICADO time, and the Nature podcast entry promotes the journal's own paper. Those interests are visible but partially checked: Science News quotes two unaffiliated researchers and Scientific American quotes two more, one of whom independently checked the team's calculations.
Facts firm, timeline uncertain
Five publishers, four with substantive reporting, agree on every quantitative parameter and on the peer-reviewed source, so confidence in the discovery is high. Confidence in the assessment overall is capped by the forward-looking core - the spin measurement is a decade-out forecast with acknowledged degeneracies and assumption dependence - and by the absence of any source detailing the paper's statistical analysis (the Live Science text is truncated mid-sentence).
science
A phage kinase with no target list: EMBL finds one enzyme that breaks several bacterial defences1 distinct publisher
science
HIPAA Covers Less Than You Think, And "Anonymized" Is Not A Legal Shield1 distinct publisher
product
LLNL closes a 20 percent gap in diamond melting, and stakes a fusion gain claim on it1 distinct publisher
science
Psilocybin's 'oneness' now has a brain-network correlate, and it was found by sorting people on self-report1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
livescience.com
1 article · August 19, 2026
nature.com
1 article · August 18, 2026
phys.org
1 article · August 19, 2026
sciencenews.org
1 article · August 19, 2026
scientificamerican.com
1 article · August 19, 2026