Science1 publisher3 min readPublished Updated
The Whippet: a black hole shredded a massive star, and fast helium turned up months later
Astronomers report helium moving unexpectedly fast long after AT2024wpp peaked, which they read as surviving stellar structure. That complicates the tidy version of tidal disruption.
The Scientist · Science desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened
- Anna Ho, an assistant professor of astronomy at Cornell University and a coauthor on the paper, detected the transient soon after its light arrived at Earth using the Zwicky Transient Facility at Palomar Observatory in California; it is formally designated AT2024wpp and nicknamed the Whippet.
- Associate Professor of Astrophysics Daniel Perley of Liverpool John Moores University is lead author of a paper in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, and the event was presented at the AAS conference in Phoenix, Arizona.
- For a brief period the energy released reached roughly 400 billion times the output of the Sun, surpassing even the most powerful supernovae known to astronomers.
- The event generated a powerful shock wave that travelled outward through dense surrounding gas at one fifth the speed of light.
- After about half a year the shock suddenly appeared to fizzle out; researchers believe it fizzles after reaching the outer boundary of a bubble created by gas the doomed star had previously expelled.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
Astronomers say a black hole tore apart a massive star in a transient designated AT2024wpp and nicknamed the Whippet, and that months afterwards they found helium moving unexpectedly fast in the aftermath, which they read as a sign that some stellar structure survived [1][6]. If that reading holds, the neat version of a tidal disruption event, in which a star is fully unbound and fed smoothly into a disk, is not what happened here.
Anna Ho, an assistant professor at Cornell, picked the object up with the Zwicky Transient Facility at Palomar Observatory soon after its light arrived [1]. Within a day, the Liverpool Telescope in the Canary Islands and NASA's Swift satellite showed the signatures expected of a Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transient: extremely blue, and emitting X-rays [8]. Distance measurements from R. Michael Rich at UCLA and Yu Jing Qin at Caltech, together with an exceptionally high temperature, put the energy release far above an ordinary supernova [9]. At peak, the reported output was roughly 400 billion times the Sun's, exceeding the most powerful supernovae known [3].
Daniel Perley of Liverpool John Moores University, lead author of a paper in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, presented the work at the AAS meeting in Phoenix [2]. He described "a black hole merging with a massive companion star, shredding it into a disk that feeds the black hole" [7], and said the event was many times more energetic than any similar one and more than any known explosion powered by stellar collapse [12]. Tidal disruption events have been seen before, but not at this scale, according to the researchers [11].
The proposed mechanism is layered. Stripped material formed a hot inward-spiralling disk that produced X-rays and a strong wind; that outflow struck gas the star had shed before its destruction, generating the blue optical and ultraviolet light of the first days along with radio and millimetre emission [10]. A shock ran outward through the dense surrounding gas at one fifth the speed of light [4]. After about half a year it appeared to fizzle out, which the team attributes to the shock reaching the outer edge of a bubble blown by the star's earlier mass loss [5].
The helium is the load-bearing anomaly and also the thinnest part of the account. The material credits late-time observations to Keck Observatory, Magellan Observatory and a further facility [13], but gives no velocity, no mass, and no epoch more precise than "months later" [6]. It also stops short of asserting a survivor: structure "may have survived" [6]. Worth noting that the shock's fizzle at roughly six months and the fast helium sit in the same post-peak window [14], so both late-time oddities are being read off the same stretch of data. The framing offered by the team, a star consumed gradually and piece by piece [15], is at least compatible with repeated partial stripping of a bound companion rather than one clean disruption, though the release does not make that argument explicitly.
What to watch: whether the published spectra put a number on the helium velocity and mass, and whether that emission is better explained by a remnant core or by a shell of previously ejected gas; whether radio and millimetre monitoring resumes after the shock fizzled [5]; and whether other LFBOTs, once observed this late, show the same helium.