Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

Closing a polymer chain into a ring widened interfacial mixing from 1.9 to 5.0 nanometres

Ring-shaped polylactide mixed much further into a chemically identical layer than the linear version of the same chain length. A prediction from 1986 finally has a direct measurement at a real polymer interface.

The Scientist · Science desk

Photograph accompanying Closing a polymer chain into a ring widened interfacial mixing from 1.9 to 5.0 nanometres
Photo: snu.ac.kr

What happened

  • Teams led by So Youn Kim and Kyoung Taek Kim at Seoul National University got two poorly mixing plastic layers to mix by turning one linear polymer into a ring, leaving its chemistry unchanged.
  • At matched molecular weight, the interfacial mixing width was 1.9 nm for two linear polymers and 5.0 nm when one of them was a ring, about 2.6 times wider.
  • The authors report this as the first direct observation of that topological entropy effect at an actual polymer interface.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • capability Adhesion between layers becomes something a formulator can set by choosing chain architecture, without adding a compatibilizer to a stack whose other properties have to survive the addition.
  • constraint Pure ring polymers are difficult to synthesise, so the lever sits for now with groups that can make them, not with a converter buying resin by the drum.
  • decision Anyone weighing ring architecture is deciding on evidence from a single polymer, polylactide, with both layers of the same chemistry and differing only in chain length and topology.
  • precedent A prediction that lived in theory and simulation since 1986 now has an interfacial measurement to be tested against, which raises the bar for the next topology claim made from simulation alone.

A short polymer chain pays a price for entering a melt of longer chains. It loses conformational entropy, the freedom to take many configurations, and that penalty on its own can make mixing unfavourable even when the two polymers are chemically identical [7]. Cates and Deutsch proposed in 1986 that a ring changes the count. A long linear chain can pass through the loop like a thread, and each threading adds configurations the pair would not otherwise have, so interfacial miscibility should improve. The idea is known as the topological entropy effect [9].

The comparison was built so that architecture was the only variable [16]. Kyoung Taek Kim's group synthesised linear and ring polylactide with discrete, pure molecular-weight distributions [11]. The two were matched for chain length, laid on a thin film of higher-molecular-weight deuterated PLA, and the interface was read on the REF-V neutron reflectometer at the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute's HANARO reactor [12]. The team confirmed that interfacial diffusion had reached equilibrium and no longer changed over time [13], so neither figure is a snapshot of an unfinished process. Deuterium is what makes the interface visible to neutrons, and it is also a chemical substitution; separate wetting experiments tested whether the hydrogen-deuterium swap had produced the difference, and the team attributed the result to molecular topology [14].

Two linear layers of the same chemistry barely mixed at all [17]. Putting a ring on one side added 3.1 nanometres of mixed zone [15]. These are structural widths at a buried interface [2], and the property they are argued to govern is interlayer adhesion and stability [6].

Both layers here were polylactide, one of them deuterated and heavier [11] [12]. That is the same-chemistry, mismatched-molecular-weight case that has traditionally been handled by adding a compatibilizer to the stack [7] [8]. Chemically different polymer pairs were not part of the experiment. Multilayer stacks of this kind are used in food packaging, functional films and display materials, and when the interface mixes poorly the layers can detach or peel, taking barrier performance and durability with them [5] [6].

Pure ring polymers are hard to make, and isolating an entropy effect from everything else happening at an interface is hard to do experimentally. Those two difficulties are why the 1986 prediction went four decades without a direct test [10]. The paper is in ACS Central Science [4].

What to watch

  • Whether peel or lap-shear tests on ring-containing laminates track the neutron mixing widths.
  • Whether pure ring polymers can be made beyond the discrete-distribution laboratory batches used here.
  • Whether the same widening appears in polymers other than polylactide.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories