Skip to content

standard

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

A provision of the 1996 Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. §230) shielding online platforms from liability for content posted by third-party users.

Known aliases

  • 47 U.S.C. 230
  • CDA 230
  • Communications Decency Act of 1996
  • Communications Decency Act Section 230
  • Section 230
  • Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

Relationships

No evidence-backed relationships are recorded.

Current stories

product9 publishers

Four AGs put Meta's engagement design on trial, not its content moderation

California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey say features built to extend teen sessions are the defect. A court has already dismissed Meta's Section 230 appeal in the case.

Perspective Coverage

9 publishers
Builder
Builder 28%
Operator
Operator 36%
Investor
Investor 36%

Reality

Evidence66
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+40
Incentives75
Confidence62
invest8 publishers

Meta's Oakland trial prices design risk, not damages

California's AG says the child-safety case is about civil penalties and restitution, not damages. The exposure sits between $200 billion and $1.4 trillion, plus an order to strip features.

Perspective Coverage

8 publishers
Builder
Builder 21%
Operator
Operator 38%
Investor
Investor 41%

Reality

Evidence72
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+35
Incentives60
Confidence68
science4 publishers

Meta's $18bn settlement writes teen defaults into Instagram, with an auditor holding the pass mark

The cash amortises over a decade. The enforceable part is a short list of numbers with an independent auditor attached, agreed by 29 attorneys general without any finding of liability.

Perspective Coverage

4 publishers
Builder
Builder 26%
Operator
Operator 50%
Investor
Investor 24%

Reality

Evidence66
Adoption10
Hype gap+25
Incentives62
Confidence60
invest1 publisher

New York City Council proposes making AI vendors liable for harm from jailbroken tools

New York City Council Speaker Julie Menin's bills would let residents sue AI vendors over jailbroken tools, with all 51 members hearing them October 5. Tied to sales in the city, the duty would reach vendors ahead of any federal rule, though a pending Senate bill would likely override most state AI laws.

Publishers:fortune.com

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+10
Incentives40
Confidence45