Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Jin Hee-sun prices Seoul's Yongsan Park rental plan as a lottery for a few tenants
A bill to carve residential land out of Yongsan Park is before the National Assembly, and the urban planner arguing against it puts the alternative at 500,000 to 1 million homes around Seoul's subway stations.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- A bill to amend the special act on Yongsan Park was introduced in the National Assembly late last month, allowing part of the site to be developed as residential land, and follow-up work is under way.
- More than 50,000 people have signed a public petition calling for the park to be preserved in full.
- Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon has pushed back strongly, saying he cannot agree to even one centimeter of damage to Yongsan Park.
- Jin Hee-sun, an urban planning advisor at Bae, Kim & Lee, told Seoul Economic Daily that anyone who moves into public rental housing at Yongsan Park is essentially winning the lottery.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- contradiction The plan was moved to stabilize Seoul home prices, but Jin's judgment is that supply will not come quickly and would do little about a greater Seoul shortage.
- exposure The objections have already produced calls for the government to gather public opinion, and the ruling party owns whatever that consultation costs in time while the bill sits in committee.
- precedent Approving discounted units on this site fixes the allocation standard for the next parcel of public land the government wants to build on.
Jin Hee-sun's objection is about who receives the benefit. "A policy that hands a precious national asset to a small number of people as a benefit is not desirable," Jin, an advisor at the law firm Bae, Kim & Lee and a former Seoul vice mayor for administrative affairs, told Seoul Economic Daily [6][7]. He also said: "Everyone agrees on taking care of people starting out in society and the vulnerable, such as young adults and newlyweds, but the way it is carried out has to be realistic" [25]. On the units themselves he was blunter: "Supplying half-price apartments and half-price jeonse and monthly rentals in good locations that many people prefer is little more than fiction" [10]. Jin did not give a unit count for the Yongsan site.
His alternative is a change of trigger. Jin said "floor area ratios near subway stations should be allowed up to 1,000% regardless of whether the zoning is residential or commercial, so that high-density development can take place" [11]. Seoul now caps ratios by zoning type: 400% in semi-residential districts, 800% in general commercial and 1,000% in central commercial [14]. The city already permits the number Jin wants; he would swap the zoning label for distance from a station as the trigger. Against a citywide average of 150% to 160%, 1,000% is about six to seven times [13][21].
The supply figure rests on a Tokyo comparison. Jin put the 23 wards at about 6 million homes against Seoul's 4 million [12], a gap of 2 million [19], and the 500,000 to 1 million homes he attributes to station-area density would close a quarter to half of that [13][20].
He then drew a line at redevelopment. "When rebuilding and other redevelopment projects go ahead, larger sites turn into apartment complexes of several thousand units," Jin said, adding that landscape and traffic have to be weighed and that excessive increases in ratios are not desirable [15]. The 1,000% he wants would therefore sit on station-area sites outside rebuilding schemes.
A citywide station rule would be negotiated in every station neighbourhood in Seoul; the Yongsan amendment is one site and one bill [1]. I would expect the ruling party to prefer the narrow fight, and the risk in that preference is that a park is easier to defend in public than a table of ratios. Jin said Yongsan Park "has a history of foreign occupation during a period of national suffering, and it is significant as a large green space in the middle of the city center" [26].
Jin also proposed lifting third-generation new town ratios from about 200% to between 250% and 300%, which he put at roughly 100,000 additional homes [16]. His station-area rule is five to ten times that [22].
What to watch
- Whether the National Assembly committee takes up the special act amendment, and whether the government runs a formal public opinion process before it does.
- Whether Seoul proposes a station-proximity trigger for floor area ratios, and at what percentage.
- Whether the ruling party attaches a unit count and a completion date to the Yongsan site.