Product1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
The third straight profit decline came with smartphone gross margin at 8.5 percent, down from 11.5 percent, as memory suppliers shift capacity to AI. The cost is already reaching buyers.
The Product Desk · Product desk

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Xiaomi posted its third consecutive quarterly profit decline in the second quarter, with adjusted net income down about 43 percent to 6.22bn yuan ($922mn) and revenue down 6.1 percent to 108.9bn yuan, and it named component costs including memory first among the causes [1][2][6][7]. The consequence for anyone shipping devices or buying fleets is narrower than the earnings headline: the memory shortage has moved out of supplier commentary and into device gross margins and retail prices, with US phone prices up this summer and Apple testing Chinese memory chips to secure its own supply [15][16].
The number to read is the smartphone gross margin, which narrowed to 8.5 percent from 11.5 percent a year earlier, according to Reuters [11]. That is three percentage points, or roughly a quarter of the margin the phone business had [1]. Overall gross margin was 19.8 percent, and the reported net profit fall of 20.5 percent was much shallower than the adjusted figure [3][4].
Now the volume side. Handset revenue fell 7.5 percent to 42.1bn yuan while shipments fell 26 percent to 31.2mn units, the research firm Omdia said [10][12]. Implied revenue per handset therefore rose to about 1,350 yuan from about 1,080 [3]. Xiaomi collected roughly a quarter more per phone and still surrendered roughly a quarter of its handset margin [1][3]. Bloomberg Intelligence treated higher average selling prices as a partial cushion for the shipment plunge [20]; the margin line suggests the cushion was thin.
The exposure is structural, not a bad quarter of execution. More than half of Xiaomi's units sold below $200, which Omdia said made it more vulnerable to rising memory costs than any other top-five brand, and Counterpoint recorded the steepest shipment drop among the five largest makers [13][14]. Xiaomi is the third-largest phone maker and sells the full range, from foldables to sub-$100 handsets [8]. Cheap devices have the least headroom to absorb a part that suppliers are rationing: Samsung and SK Hynix have shifted production toward advanced chips for AI data centres, squeezing conventional memory supply and lifting prices, Bloomberg reported [9].
Xiaomi president William Lu told reporters that memory prices stayed at historically high levels in the quarter, that the pace of increases had started to slow and should keep slowing in the second half, and that the hardest stretch for the phone business was over after changes to product mix and launch schedule [17][18]. Note what that is not. Decelerating increases are not falling prices; on the company's own account, the plateau is high.
The rest of the portfolio does not cover the gap. EV, AI and other new initiatives reached about 23 percent of revenue, up from 18.3 percent a year earlier, and EV revenue rose 15.9 percent to 23.9bn yuan [21], but Bloomberg reported that the car push has weighed on the bottom line in a fierce price war, with two new hybrid models launched below expected prices [22]. Connected devices stayed soft on reduced subsidies and subdued consumer demand [23]. Shares are nonetheless up nearly 20 percent in Hong Kong since the end of June [19].
Three things to watch. Whether smartphone gross margin moves back toward 11.5 percent next quarter, which is the direct test of Lu's guidance [11][17]. Whether the revenue miss, 108.9bn yuan against a 112.2bn forecast and about 2.9 percent short, hardens into a pattern of trading units for price [6][2]. And whether Apple's testing of Chinese memory chips turns into qualified second sourcing [16], since re-sourcing at that scale is what a buyer does when it has stopped treating a shortage as seasonal.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Xiaomi's adjusted net income dropped about 43 percent to 6.22bn yuan ($922mn).
Reuters reported a 42.6 percent fall in adjusted profit; analysts had expected 6.6bn yuan on average, according to LSEG data.
Xiaomi's profit fell in the second quarter, its third straight quarterly profit decline, Bloomberg reported.
Reported net profit fell 20.5 percent, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Overall gross margin slipped to 19.8 percent, and both profit measures missed forecasts.
Revenue fell 6.1 percent from a year earlier to 108.9bn yuan, about $16.2bn, short of the 112.2bn yuan analysts had forecast, Reuters said.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Specific reported figures, but one aggregating publisher and unattributed edges
The core financials are precise and multiply attributed within the piece (Bloomberg, Reuters, The Wall Street Journal, LSEG consensus) and are reinforced by a direct company statement plus independent tracker data from Omdia and Counterpoint. Weaknesses are structural: the cluster has a single publisher that reports no primary filing directly, two versions of the adjusted-profit decline coexist, and the pass-through claims about US prices and Apple's memory testing carry no attribution at all.
Real, measured market impact already visible in units, margins and prices
This is not a speculative trend: third-party trackers put shipments at 31.2mn units, down 26 percent, segment margin compression is reported at the line-item level, the diversification shift shows up as EV and new initiatives moving to about 23 percent of revenue, and the article reports cost pass-through reaching buyers and a peer supply hedge. The pass-through observations are the weakest links, being unattributed, which caps the score below the level the disclosed financial and shipment data would otherwise support.
Slightly overstated on recovery and per-unit framing; the downside is well evidenced
The bad news is stated with numbers rather than adjectives, so there is little inflation on the cost squeeze itself. Mild overstatement comes from two places: the recovery narrative rests on management's own assertion that the hardest stretch is over plus a share rally read as vindication, neither independently evidenced; and the headline per-unit revenue rise is an approximation that divides a company revenue line by a third-party shipment estimate and may reflect mix and regional shifts rather than pricing power. Bloomberg Intelligence's roughly 20 percent EV growth estimate also runs ahead of the 15.9 percent reported revenue rise.
Management guidance and market-narrative interests visibly shape the forward-looking material
Several load-bearing statements come from parties with a stake in the interpretation: Xiaomi's own earnings statement attributes the miss to external component costs and competition, President Lu tells reporters the worst has passed and that mix and launch timing were adjusted, and the CFO frames AI spending as deliberate long-term input with no rush to monetise. Sell-side-adjacent analysis supplies the cushioning read and the EV growth estimate, and the share rally is used as corroboration of recovery. The historical figures themselves come from audited-style disclosure and independent trackers, which limits how far incentives can distort the backward-looking record.
Solid on the reported quarter, weak on causation split and outlook
Confidence is moderate: the quarter's reported outcomes are specific, internally consistent and corroborated by two independent shipment trackers, so the direction and magnitude of the squeeze are reliable. It is held down by the single-publisher cluster with no primary filing cited, two figures for the same adjusted-profit decline, no independent memory price data to test the claimed slowdown, no decomposition of margin loss between memory cost, mix and competition, and unattributed claims about US pricing and Apple's sourcing.
product
Memory-cost inflation is now shrinking smartphone demand, and moving share while it does1 distinct publisher
product
Alibaba's 75% profit drop is what a working cloud business costs1 distinct publisher
invest
A trillion-dollar memory stock is now Boise's biggest concentration risk1 distinct publisher
build
SMIC's first $3 billion quarter comes with a wafer price increase attached1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 19, 2026