Product1 publisher3 min readPublished
Eight jurisdictions set four different minimum ages for a social media account
The under-16 ban Australia passed in December 2025 now has company in Brazil, Canada and the EU, and each version picks its own age and its own list of covered surfaces. Two of the nine are actually in force.
The Product Desk · Product desk

What happened
- Australia's Online Safety Amendment has required platforms including TikTok, Instagram, YouTube and Snapchat to run age verification and take "reasonable steps" against under-16 account creation since December 2025.
- Brazil's Digital Statute of Children and Adolescents came into force in March 2026 and requires under-16s to link their accounts to a legal guardian rather than barring them outright.
- Canada's proposed Safe Social Media Act, announced on June 11, 2026, would apply to companies that use AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude as well as to TikTok, YouTube and Instagram.
- The European Commission proposed the EU KIDS Act on September 17, 2026, pulling video-sharing platforms, online gaming, AI companions and app stores into scope alongside social media.
- A July 2026 study by Australian government advisors found the country's ban so far ineffective, and Mashable reports that kids are already working around laws of this kind.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint One global age gate is wrong somewhere: set it at 16 and you lock out the 14-year-olds Austria's bill would let in; set it at 13 and Australia's duty goes unmet.
- decision A team shipping an assistant now has to decide whether it is an age-gated surface, because Canada's draft puts chatbot operators under the same verification duty as social platforms.
- cost France's January 2027 phase turns compliance into a re-verification campaign against the installed base, and the friction lands on people who already have working accounts.
- exposure Age assurance means collecting identity data on minors, and Mashable reports these laws are already criticised on privacy and free speech grounds, so the gate a team ships becomes its own liability surface.
A 15-year-old with the same app on the same phone gets a different answer in four countries. Austria's bill, announced in March 2026, would draw the line at 14, so she is through [1]. France's compromise, reached on July 20, 2026, draws it at 15, so she is not [1]. In Brazil she can hold an account if it is linked to a legal guardian [1]. Australia and Canada set 16 [1][1]. Across the nine jurisdictions in Mashable's tally, eight name an age and those eight produce four different numbers: 13, 14, 15 and 16 [2].
The EU proposal is where the count gets large. If the EU KIDS Act passes, all 27 member states are in scope [3], and Mashable names five of them with national measures of their own: Austria, Denmark, France, Germany and Greece [1][1][1][1][1]. That leaves 22 states where the EU threshold would be the only one a product has to read [3]. It has two numbers in it, a ban for under-13s and limited use for under-15s [1]. Mashable's introduction also counts the UK and Indonesia among the countries moving on under-16 access [4].
The statutes describe a list of covered surfaces. Brazil requires platforms to limit "features designed to artificially increase, sustain, or extend" the time kids spend, and names automatically playing videos [2]. Canada's bill would reach companies that use AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude [2]. The EU text covers video-sharing platforms, online gaming, AI chatbots or companions and app stores, with verification through an EU age verification app or third-party platforms [2].
The outcome evidence is thin. Mashable reports that kids are already finding ways around these laws [1], and that the laws have been criticised for their efficiency and their impact on digital privacy and free speech [2]. Reddit is suing over the Australian regime [3].
France shows the ordering. Under-15s cannot create new accounts as of Sept. 1, and in January 2027 all existing accounts come under the law, according to Le Monde [2]. That second date covers accounts opened before anyone asked for an age [5].
Does the jurisdiction want the minor excluded or supervised, and does the duty attach to new accounts or to the whole base? Australia is exclusion at signup [1]. Brazil is supervision, with a guardian on the account [1]. France starts at signup and reaches existing accounts in January 2027 [2]. Filling in that grid comes before picking a verification vendor, and Mashable's list does not price any of it. Australia's Act took effect in December 2025; about seven months later, a study by Australian government advisers found the ban so far ineffective [1][4][2].
What to watch
- Whether France's bill is approved before the Sept. 1 new-account block, and whether the January 2027 retroactive phase survives the final text.
- Reddit's suit against Australia's regime, and any ruling that puts content on the phrase "reasonable steps".
- Whether app stores, online gaming and AI companions stay in scope as the EU KIDS Act moves through the 27 member states.