Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

Vieworks' 2030 doubling needs six times the growth it managed last year

Vieworks wants 110 billion won of revenue by 2030 out of a camera line that added 1.1 billion won last year. The orders that would get it there are placed by chip toolmakers, one step removed from the fabs.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Vieworks' 2030 doubling needs six times the growth it managed last year
Photo: en.sedaily.com

What happened

  • Vieworks ran a TDI line scan machine vision system at its Anyang laboratory, where division head Kwon Hyuk-hoon pointed to a black dot on the monitor as contamination on metal wiring that marks a panel defective.
  • The company reported consolidated industrial camera revenue of 31.5 billion won in 2023, 37.2 billion won in 2024 and 38.3 billion won last year.
  • Semiconductors made up about 65 percent of the optical imaging division's 24.9 billion won of first-half revenue this year, a mix that has been shifting away from displays.
  • Kwon said this year's semiconductor supercycle should carry divisional revenue past its all-time high of 55 billion won.
  • He set a goal of doubling this year's revenue level by 2030, with the lineup covering both front-end circuitry inspection and back-end packaging.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Because Vieworks reaches all three major memory chipmakers through equipment suppliers rather than directly, it cannot time or hedge the capex cycle independently: its order book turns when the toolmakers' does, and cancellations arrive by the same route.
  • contradiction The company's own two revenue figures do not sit on the same basis, and until they are reconciled the 2030 promise could mean anything from roughly 100 billion won to comfortably above 110 billion.
  • exposure The price competition that capped the display business is the live threat to the semiconductor mix, since customisation is a defence only while rivals cannot match the spec at a lower price.
  • decision Selling complete solutions tuned to one customer's machine means engineering capacity committed to one equipment maker's specification is capacity not available for a general-purpose product that would sell to everyone.

The word doubling hides how steep the slope is. Growth in the industrial camera line ran at 18.1 percent in 2024 and then 3.0 percent last year, an increase of 1.1 billion won [1]. Take Kwon Hyuk-hoon's expectation that the optical imaging division closes this year above its 55 billion won record [4], and doubling that by 2030 puts the target at 110 billion won: four years of compounding at about 18.9 percent a year, or 14.9 percent if the clock is allowed five [5]. Set against last year's 3.0 percent, that is roughly six times the pace [6].

The nearer test is smaller and harder to argue with. The second half has to bill at least 30.1 billion won, about 21 percent more than the first, for the 55 billion claim to land [4].

A scope problem sits underneath both numbers. That 55 billion is 44 percent above the highest of the three years the company disclosed [8], so the all-time high is not inside the series it gave; either the peak belongs to the display era before 2023, or the division figure covers more than the industrial camera line. The source does not reconcile the two, which leaves the base being doubled loose by something like ten billion won. (I would rather have the reconciliation than the target.)

What is genuinely moving is the mix. The semiconductor slice of first-half revenue was 16.2 billion won [3]; hold that share through a 55 billion year and it becomes 35.8 billion, within four percent of what the entire camera line billed in 2024 [7]. The vehicle is an area scan camera originally designed for displays, capturing 24,500 pixels, now sold to inspect the large packages of AI chips in back-end processes, alongside the TDI line scan camera aimed at fine circuitry in front-end steps [11][12].

The pivot was defensive in origin: the display-centred business hit a ceiling when low-priced Chinese products penetrated the market [7], and the semiconductor answer is customisation, because chip equipment makers wanted products optimised for their own machines rather than general-purpose items [8], backed by vertical integration from sensors to finished product and by sitting closer to East Asian customers than North American rivals do [9][10]. That is a real advantage right up to the day it is copied at a lower price, which is the history of the display line.

The demand signal also arrives second-hand. Vieworks reaches all three major memory chipmakers through equipment suppliers [6], so it books when the toolmakers book and stops when they stop, and the source carries no backlog, customer concentration or margin figures to size either direction.

My read, with the counter in the same breath: the 55 billion is the credible number, because it rests on products prepared over three to four years that have already turned into orders [12], while 110 billion by 2030 rests on four more years of AI chip and advanced packaging investment that nobody in Anyang controls [13]. If inspection work per advanced package keeps climbing, 19 percent compound is unremarkable for a supplier in that seat, and I will have been too cautious.

What to watch

  • Whether second-half revenue clears the 30.1 billion won needed to make the 55 billion won full-year claim good.
  • Any disclosure that reconciles the 38.3 billion won industrial camera line with the 55 billion won divisional peak, which fixes the base being doubled.
  • Whether customised semiconductor machine vision attracts the same low-priced competition that capped the display business.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories