Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

A $433M Bitcoin ETF session nets out to roughly 77 coins for the week

Fidelity and BlackRock supplied about 97% of the $433 million that US spot bitcoin ETFs took in on September 18, and the week they rescued still finished at plus $6.2 million, worth about 77 bitcoin.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying A $433M Bitcoin ETF session nets out to roughly 77 coins for the week

What happened

  • US spot Bitcoin ETFs took in $433 million on September 18, a single session that cryptobriefing.com credits with reversing the week's outflows.
  • The same week had opened with $450.4 million of withdrawals on September 15 and a further $296 million the following day.
  • Fidelity's FBTC absorbed about $310.7 million of the September 18 total, against roughly $108.4 million for BlackRock's IBIT.
  • Bitcoin held above $81,000 through the weekend, with intraday prints near or above $82,000 between September 19 and 21.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint A week whose net creations amount to about 77 coins cannot be what is holding the price, and the same report's late-August comparison ran 310 times larger for a move to the same $80,000 area.
  • exposure About 46% of the category's assets is accumulated price gain rather than money paid in, so issuer fee income is levered to bitcoin's mark.
  • precedent Volatile sessions are now where Fidelity takes share from BlackRock, at nearly three dollars for every one, and the assets league table is what the two are contesting.

Add up the three sessions cryptobriefing.com itemises and the week goes backwards: minus $450.4 million on September 15, minus $296 million on September 16, plus $433 million on September 18, for a net of minus $313.4 million [3][1][1]. The published weekly figure is plus $6.2 million [2]. The report does not break out the week's other two sessions. Between them they must therefore have supplied about $320 million of net creations [2].

At $81,000 a coin, $6.2 million is roughly 77 bitcoin [3]. The ETF complex produced that much net new spot demand across a full trading week in which the price climbed above $81,000 and printed near or above $82,000 into September 21 [6][3]. Late August, on the same report's count, ran $1.92 billion in a week, about 310 times the size, and cryptobriefing.com credits that week with pushing bitcoin back above $80,000 in the first place [8][4].

Creations do require the issuer to buy spot, and redemptions work the same way in reverse, so a $433 million session is roughly 5,350 coins bought in a day and is a real bid while it lasts [11][5]. Over a week, the netting is what counts. A complex that bought 5,350 coins on one session and gave back nearly $750 million over two others left the float about 77 coins lighter [5][14][3].

I think the flows here are following the price, and cryptobriefing.com's own paragraph on short covering by traders who had bet against bitcoin points the same way [7]. Two other readings survive those numbers: ETF flows are only the visible slice of the bid, so $6.2 million net understates what institutions actually did. Netting also flatters a violent week, because $750 million of redemptions across two consecutive sessions can move a thin book even when a single inflow day restores the weekly total [14].

Cumulative net inflows since the January 2024 debut come to about $55.1 billion, and category net assets are around $102.5 billion to $103 billion [9][10]. The gap is about $47.4 billion, or roughly 46% of assets, and it is price, not money in [6][7]. Issuer fees are levied on assets, so the fee pool tracks bitcoin's price far more closely than it tracks net creations.

Fidelity's FBTC and BlackRock's IBIT took $419.1 million of the $433 million between them, about 97%, with FBTC pulling 2.9 times IBIT's figure [4][5][8][9]. cryptobriefing.com wrote that IBIT "has long been considered the category leader by total assets" while FBTC "has been increasingly aggressive in attracting flows during volatile periods" [13].

The flow-driven thesis fails if the next heavy-outflow stretch takes the price down with it. cryptobriefing.com set that test itself, calling $80,000 "the line in the sand" and saying a sustained break below it, particularly alongside consecutive days of heavy ETF outflows, "would challenge that thesis quickly" [12].

What to watch

  • Whether the full weekly flow data shows the two unpublished sessions supplying the roughly $320 million the weekly total implies.
  • Whether FBTC keeps outpulling IBIT by nearly three to one on volatile days, and how fast that closes the assets gap.
  • A sustained break below $80,000 alongside consecutive heavy outflow sessions, the test cryptobriefing.com set for the flow-driven thesis.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories