Skip to content

Build1 publisher2 min readPublished

More than 100 UK scientists worked on projects funded by an institute tied to Chinese intelligence, MI5 says

MI5 named a research funder it links to China's Ministry of State Security and said more than 100 UK scientists worked on projects it paid for. Continued work with it risks prosecution under the 2023 National Security Act, so partners of those labs need to check who pays.

The Engineer · Build desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying More than 100 UK scientists worked on projects funded by an institute tied to Chinese intelligence, MI5 says
Generated illustration

What happened

  • MI5 says the institute exists mainly to fund academic research that directly improves the technical spying capabilities of China's Ministry of State Security.
  • The funded projects covered AI, cybersecurity, covert communication systems and steganography, the practice of hiding information inside messages or objects.
  • Security minister Dan Jarvis wrote to the heads of all UK universities urging them to end any ties with the institute.
  • China's embassy in the UK called the accusations fabricated, said it had lodged a formal protest, and told UK intelligence to stop spreading falsehoods.

Compiled by The EngineerSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision Companies that sponsor or co-author university work in these fields now have to ask partners for their full funder list, because MI5 ties prosecution risk to continued work on institute-funded projects.
  • exposure MI5's good-faith allowance covers past collaboration; a researcher still on an institute-funded project after a public, named warning can no longer rely on not having known.
  • constraint A denylist entry under one English name will miss records filed as China Academy of General Technology, so funder screening has to carry every known rendering of the name.

The exposure MI5 describes sits on a lab's grant list. An industry partner deals with a research group and its lead investigator. It sees the group's other funders only if it asks. MI5 acknowledged that many scientists and institutions may have worked with the institute in good faith, unaware of its links to the Ministry of State Security [8]. If the researchers did not know, their partners had even less chance of knowing.

That allowance covers work already done. MI5 said further cooperation could lead to prosecution under the National Security Act 2023 [10]. That law widened the state's powers against foreign espionage and hostile state activity [11]. A collaborator who keeps a project running after a public warning that names the funder is in a weaker position to claim ignorance than one who signed before it.

The first check is a name match, and the institute has more than one English name. The Ukrainian report's rendering translates as Chinese Institute of General Technology Research, and the report notes the body is sometimes called the China Academy of General Technology [9]. A screening rule keyed to one string misses paperwork filed under the other. Both forms, plus any Chinese-language form a partner's grants office holds, need to be in the lookup.

The report does not name the universities or projects, and it does not say whether the prosecution warning reaches companies that partner with the affected labs. Security minister Dan Jarvis's remarks were carried in Ukrainian translation by mezha.net. He said the warning exposed attempts by Chinese intelligence to covertly exploit the knowledge and research of UK scientists [13]. He said international partnerships are essential for universities and research institutions, but that the government would take firm measures against the threats it faces [13].

This is the first espionage warning MI5 has published on its own [6]. The two earlier cautions cited in the report concerned approaches to individuals. Last year MI5 director general Ken McCallum said Chinese spies posed a daily threat to UK national security and had used fake job adverts to draw British specialists into handing over information [15]. In November MI5 told MPs that Chinese agents posing as recruiters or company employees were trying to gather information on them and influence their work [16].

This warning names a funding body instead. It arrives while the government is trying to improve trade ties with Beijing and has approved plans for the largest Chinese embassy in Europe, in London [14]. The account here comes from mezha.net, which cites CNN [2].

What to watch

  • Whether MI5 or the government names the universities and projects involved, or issues guidance to companies that partner with those labs.
  • Any prosecution under the National Security Act 2023 linked to continued work with the institute.
  • How UK universities respond to Dan Jarvis's letters asking them to cut ties.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories