Skip to content

Leadership1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere3 min readPublished

Stellantis's write-down equals 37% of its product plan, and Leapmotor is the admission

Shares are down more than 55% this year, the EV charge is worth over a third of the five-year model budget, and the CEO's answer to analysts is still that these things take time.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Stellantis's write-down equals 37% of its product plan, and Leapmotor is the admission
Photo: forbes.com

What happened

  • Stellantis shares are down more than 55% this year amid pressure for radical action on Chinese competition, EV missteps and too many brands.
  • A 22.2 billion euro write-down and a large 2025 loss, disclosed in February, were attributed mainly to misjudging how fast EV demand would arrive.
  • Bernstein downgraded the stock to underperform, calling the second quarter a sobering reality check and the final straw.

Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost Shareholders have already paid for roughly a third of a product cycle and hold no vehicles for it, which is the bill that makes further patience expensive rather than free.
  • constraint At under 2 billion euros each over five years, keeping the ten non-core brands and renewing them are now mutually exclusive choices.
  • contradiction UBS holds back a sell rating on hope of a strong U.S. recovery while HSBC sees U.S.
  • decision A BYD approach for Maserati would turn brand pruning from an internal cost exercise into a decision about selling assets to the competitor Stellantis is trying to catch.

A board can defend a slow turnaround for as long as it can name something that will be provably true or false by a date. The May plan does not supply one. It promises 60 new models by 2030 and 60 billion euros to build them [12], and it takes 800,000 units out of European capacity without identifying a plant, while cancelling no brand at all [13]. That document cannot be graded for years. The market grades in hours: the February disclosure and last month's profit miss compound to roughly a 32% fall between them [19], most of the damage from two announcements rather than a slow drift.

The funding split is where the patience runs out. If 70% of the 60 billion euros goes to Jeep, Ram, Peugeot and Fiat [14], each core brand gets about 10.5 billion euros over five years and the other ten average about 1.8 billion euros apiece [17]. Felipe Munoz of Car Industry Analysis says more than ten of the brands need new products quickly [21]. Under 2 billion euros per brand does not buy new products; it buys a facelift and a regional shelf, which is close to what Inovev describes when it says DS and Lancia will pass under the direct control of Citroen and Fiat and lose their independence [15].

Now set the write-down against that same budget. The 22.2 billion euro charge disclosed in February, taken mainly because the company misjudged the speed of the EV switch [2], is about 37% of the entire five-year product spend [18]. Shareholders paid for a product cycle's worth of engineering and hold a charge instead of cars.

Which is why buying beats building here, and why the CEO has stopped pretending otherwise. Under the deepening alliance, Leapmotor and Dongfeng would supply the EV technology and take up idle Stellantis factory capacity in Europe, either for their own products or for the same products wearing Stellantis badges [7]. Analysts applaud it as the fast route to the affordable, competitive EVs Stellantis needs in Europe [6]. It also means the cheap end of the European range becomes someone else's engineering assembled in Stellantis buildings, and no timetable exists for taking that competence back in-house. Antonio Filosa told reporters the company is on track and executing as fast as possible [5]; the alliance is the part of that sentence which is actually moving, because it does not require Stellantis to develop anything.

The scale being demanded of him is Volkswagen's: threatened layoffs of 100,000 workers and four plant closures [16]. Against that, an unnamed 800,000 units is a slide. And the boundary case is Maserati, where Inovev says BYD could bid as early as this year, with BYD declining to comment [20]. A group that cannot fund ten brands eventually sells the ones a Chinese buyer values more than it does.

What to watch

  • Whether a BYD offer for Maserati actually arrives this year, and whether Stellantis says publicly that it would entertain one.
  • The first named plant or cancelled brand attached to the 800,000-unit European capacity cut, which is the only way the May plan becomes checkable.
  • Whether the next U.S. quarter brings the de-stocking and production cuts HSBC expects or the recovery UBS is still allowing for.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories