Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

Seoul apartment permit filings fall to a third of their April peak

August brought 3,012 filings, the fewest since Seoul made the whole city a land transaction permit zone last October, and the average price on those filings still rose 0.17%, held up by the northern districts and the Han River belt.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Seoul apartment permit filings fall to a third of their April peak
Photo: mk.co.kr

What happened

  • Seoul recorded 3,012 new land transaction permit applications on apartments in August, down 34.8% from July's 4,618, the city government said on the 14th.
  • Filings have declined every month since April's 8,896, passing through 6,011 in May, 5,277 in June and 4,618 in July, a fall of 66.1% in four months.
  • The city blamed the end of a grace period on heavier capital gains taxes for multiple-home owners, higher funding costs after July and August rate rises, lending curbs, and caution over the Aug. 3 tax plan.
  • Application prices rose 0.61% in the 10 districts north of the Han River and 0.52% in the Han River belt, while falling 0.34% in the three Gangnam districts and Yongsan and 0.99% in four southwestern districts.
  • A wider exemption from owner-occupancy rules for homes with sitting tenants drew 135 applications, 4.5% of the month's total and down from 207 in July.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost Income earned per completed Seoul apartment sale now scales off a filing count at 33.9% of April's, and that squeeze does not ease while asking prices in the cheaper districts keep climbing.
  • constraint Higher funding costs and the lending restrictions narrow who can bid at all, and the districts still generating filings are the ones where application prices went up.
  • decision Valuations that lean on the citywide average now need district-level work, because that average mixes gains in the north with falls in Gangnam and the southwest on a changing sample.
  • contradiction The city calls this regional differentiation and not a uniform correction, while two of the four district groupings in its own price series fell in August.

The two decline figures for August do not agree with each other, and the calendar explains the gap. Divide the 3,012 filings by the reported daily average of 150.6 and August had 20 counting days; divide July's 4,618 by 209.9 and July had 22 [1][5][2]. So the 34.8% month-on-month fall has two missing days inside it, and the fall per working day was 28.3% [1][5].

Two comparisons set the level. August ran at 33.9% of April's 8,896 [4][1], and 25.1% below the 4,019 recorded last November, a month after the whole city became a land transaction permit zone [2][3][4].

The price side is harder to interpret. The citywide figure averages districts moving in opposite directions, over a sample whose composition is changing. Application prices across Seoul rose 0.17% in August after 1.41% in July, about 1.58% across the two months together [8][5]. Northern filings fell 31.4% to 1,471 while the rest of the city fell 37.7% [11][3]. The north was 46.4% of July's 4,618, or roughly 2,143 filings, and 1,541 of August's 3,012 came from everywhere else [1][11][3]. Its share went to 48.8% from 46.4% [11].

The Seoul Metropolitan Government said the northern districts' larger share does not reflect an increase in transactions but continued demand from people buying homes to live in, concentrated in areas where prices are relatively lower [13]. It described the market as showing regional differentiation, not a uniform correction [14].

I would not read the 0.17% as evidence that Seoul prices are holding up. Two of the four district groupings the city publishes recorded lower application prices in August [9]. The grouping with the largest gain supplied nearly half the filings [9][11], so the citywide average is being carried by the cheapest part of the city just as that part comes to dominate a shrinking sample [8][11]. Another explanation fits the same numbers. The northern bid may be owner-occupier money, less exposed to the lending restrictions and to the July and August base rate increases the city blames for higher funding costs [6][13]. Prices there could keep rising on 1,471 filings a month [11].

A recovery in filings through September and October, with northern application prices turning negative, would show a market that repriced and then cleared. That would count against my view. August instead pairs the smallest filing count since the zone took effect with rising application prices in the north and the Han River belt [2][9].

What to watch

  • Whether the Aug. 3 tax reform plan clears parliamentary review, and whether filings move once that uncertainty resolves.
  • Whether the exemption from owner-occupancy requirements for tenant-occupied homes finally lifts its share of filings.
  • Any further base rate increases after July's and August's, which would raise funding costs again for the buyers still filing.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories