Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

Scores of theory papers now chase a lone xenon flash too energetic for a plain WIMP

LZ's liquid xenon detector recorded a single burst of light on 1 September, with roughly a 1-in-200 chance it was background. Its energy alone is enough to make the simplest dark matter candidate a poor fit.

The Scientist · Science desk

Photograph accompanying Scores of theory papers now chase a lone xenon flash too energetic for a plain WIMP
Photo: newscientist.com

What happened

  • The LZ detector in South Dakota, a large tank of liquid xenon watched by camera arrays, announced on 1 September a candidate dark matter signal.
  • The collaboration recorded a single burst of light, the kind expected when a particle strikes a xenon nucleus.
  • Theorists have released scores of papers in the weeks since, many of them arguing over whether the particle could be a higgsino.
  • LZ and teams at detectors elsewhere are still analysing their data for additional events that would show the first one was real.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint One event fixes one energy value, so ranking the candidate models falls to whatever else each of them predicts.
  • capability If the higgsino reading holds, Fan's point about signals at several experimental frontiers gives colliders and other detectors something specific to hunt for while LZ waits for a second event.
  • decision Theory groups have to choose which surviving framework to work up in detail, and on Smirnov's account only the models' extra predictions can settle that before more data arrive.

The denominator is one event. It gives one energy value, and fitting a model curve would take a spectrum [24]. The other figure in circulation is the 1-in-200 chance New Scientist reports for the burst being a fluke rather than dark matter, which works out to 0.5 per cent [4][23]. That figure compares the flash against background. Ranking the models now competing to explain it is a different question [25].

Energy alone still narrows the field, because the candidates differ in what should accompany a high-energy recoil. "It's an anomalous event," said Henning Flaecher of the University of Bristol, a member of the LZ group [6]. "It's not what you would expect from the most general dark matter models," he said [7]. On Flaecher's account, a high-energy hit with no lower-energy collisions alongside it makes it exceedingly unlikely that the particle, if it exists, is a vanilla WIMP [8].

So the higgsino went into scores of abstracts. It is a non-vanilla WIMP from supersymmetry, the framework in which every known particle has a superpartner with similar properties and different spin, and it would be the superpartner of the Higgs boson [11]. A higgsino event is predicted to arrive without a host of lower-energy collisions, and that fits what LZ saw [14]. JiJi Fan of Brown University calls it the simplest WIMP explanation still available [12]. "It gives rise to a wealth of signals that could be searched for at different experimental frontiers," Fan said [13]. The basic version is in trouble already: constraints from other experiments appear to rule out the simplest higgsino model that would explain the LZ detection, so the mass would have to be much higher than expected [15].

Several other papers put the particle in extra dimensions, using models already under study for other problems in particle physics, according to Lisa Randall of Harvard University, a co-author of one of them [16]. "In some sense, the data looks like it's calling out for something like this: it avoids the pre-existing constraints and fits quite naturally," Randall said [17]. Such a candidate could fit the LZ detection and also explain why the fundamental particles have the masses they do, she said [18]. Other proposals sketch a whole dark matter sector with multiple types of dark particle [19].

Juri Smirnov of the University of Liverpool said the pile of papers is not theorists declaring their belief that the event is a true dark matter discovery. It reflects instead that, if the signal persists, its energy already tells them quite a lot about the types of physical processes that could produce it [10]. He also said: "I don't think the data currently justify saying one of these is 'the' explanation" [20]. Some of the models come with additional predictions, and Smirnov said those will be particularly useful in picking through so many ideas [21]. In New Scientist's account, the work so far is theory papers and continuing analysis at the detectors, with no collaboration in it having changed what it searches for [26].

What to watch

  • A second LZ event at a similar recoil energy, or a null result as exposure grows, would decide whether there is anything here to model.
  • Whether any collaboration publicly changes its analysis cuts or search region because of the September event.
  • Whether the higgsino papers converge on a mass range that colliders or other direct-detection experiments can test.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories