Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

A cooling failure in one data center stopped credit unions holding $2.56bn in assets

Sharetec told its credit unions that backup systems did not have time to take over when a data center lost cooling on Sept. 15. The NCUA cannot examine the vendor; its authority to do that expired.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying A cooling failure in one data center stopped credit unions holding $2.56bn in assets

What happened

  • Sharetec told affected credit unions that the failure happened on Sept. 15 and that its backup systems did not have time to take over, according to notices those credit unions posted to their members.
  • American Banker identified 23 credit unions in 14 states that lost service, holding $2.56 billion in assets and roughly 200,000 members, using the NCUA's certified June 2026 call report data.
  • Iberville Federal Credit Union in Plaquemine, Louisiana, which has $8.9 million in assets, 2,122 members and a minority depository institution designation, closed its doors on Sept. 18.
  • Sharetec has not named the company that operates the data center that failed, and Ark Data Centers has not said whether one of its facilities lost cooling. Neither responded to a request for comment.
  • Congress gave the NCUA authority to examine third-party vendors in 1998 in a law written for the Year 2000 bug, and that authority expired.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint With no regulator able to examine the vendor, the party that has to test whether failover works is the credit union buying the service, and the smallest buyer identified here runs on $8.9 million of assets.
  • decision Boards renewing core processing contracts now have to decide what proof of failover they will require before signing, because the Sept. 15 notices say the backups did not take over in time.
  • exposure The tally of affected institutions is set by which credit unions chose to publish a notice, so the number of members whose transactions stopped is a floor.
  • precedent The FSOC recommendation has gone unlegislated since 2015 and the NCUA no longer asks for the power, so the next credit union vendor outage will be supervised under exactly these rules.

Divide $2.56bn across 23 institutions and the average affected credit union holds about $111m in assets, with roughly 8,700 members [4][1][2]. Iberville Federal Credit Union sits far below that line at $8.9m, about a third of one percent of the group's assets, and it is the one that shut its branch [6][3].

The 23 is a floor. American Banker built the list from notices the credit unions posted to members and from local news reports [5], and Sharetec served more than 250 credit unions as of 2018 [7], so the identified institutions are fewer than one in ten of the client base the vendor had eight years ago [4].

Before 2020, four companies sold and ran the same core system in their own regions: Bradford-Scott Data of Fort Wayne, Data Systems of Texas, NDS-Sharetec of Maine and GBS-Sharetec of Ohio [10]. Evergreen Services Group, a private equity firm, bought all four and merged them into one between 2020 and 2022 [11]. Each region still has its own online banking front end. But the four sit on a single domain, onlinecu.com, and resolve to one internet address in a range the American Registry for Internet Numbers assigns to Ark Data Centers of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Sharetec's email routes through the same range, and so does the path connecting its network to the rest of the internet [12][9].

A bank in this position would have a regulator able to examine the vendor. Under the Bank Service Company Act, work a bank farms out is "subject to regulation and examination by such agency to the same extent as if such services were being performed by the depository institution itself," according to the statute [13], and bank regulators examine vendors on that basis [14]. The Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Treasury-chaired panel of federal financial regulators, has recommended every year since 2015 that Congress grant the same authority for credit union vendors [18]. The NCUA raised the point itself as recently as a 2024 report to Congress [16].

What stopped these 23 credit unions last week was cooling equipment in a building none of them selected, reached through a network four formerly separate vendors were merged onto after 2020 [11][12]. The counter-argument sits in the same record, which does not say where Bradford-Scott, Data Systems, NDS and GBS ran production before the merger. If all four already sat in the same third-party facilities, the roll-up bought billing efficiency and added no concentration at all.

What happens next depends on the rest of the client book. If the credit unions on Sharetec's other three front ends kept posting transactions on Sept. 15, the shared internet address matters less than the shared building, and only that one facility failed [12]. If instead the count of disclosed outages climbs toward the 250-plus figure, the concentration sits in the vendor. Neither Sharetec nor Ark responded to a request for comment, and neither has named the facility that overheated [8].

What to watch

  • Whether Ark or Sharetec identifies the facility that lost cooling, and how long the attempted failover actually took.
  • Whether more Sharetec client credit unions disclose Sept. 15 outages and lift the count above 23.
  • Whether the NCUA revives its request for third-party examination authority in its next report to Congress.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories