Product1 publisher3 min readPublished
Nvidia's $105bn guarantee, not OpenAI's balance sheet, is what makes Ohio's 8 gigawatts buildable
The Pike County mega-campus is being financed like utility infrastructure: a supplier-backed lease and power obligation of up to $105bn, with first compute due in 2028.
The Product Desk · Product desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction
What happened
- OpenAI, SoftBank's SB Energy and Nvidia announced a 20-year data center site in Pike County, central Ohio, with 8 IT gigawatts of computing capacity powered by 10 gigawatts of energy.
- Nvidia agreed to guarantee up to $105 billion in conditional lease and power payment obligations, acting as financial backstop should OpenAI default; in exchange Nvidia gets exclusive rights to supply the chips and a direct $1.5 billion equity investment in SB Energy.
- The data center will run exclusively on Nvidia hardware and be supported by a $4 billion-plus local energy infrastructure investment from SoftBank and SB Energy.
- The guarantee equals roughly $13 billion of conditional obligation per IT gigawatt of compute.
- Averaged across the 20-year term, the guarantee equals roughly $5.3 billion a year.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
OpenAI, SoftBank's SB Energy and Nvidia have announced a 20-year data center site in Pike County, central Ohio, carrying 8 IT gigawatts of computing capacity drawn from 10 gigawatts of energy [1]. The number that actually explains the project is not the gigawatts: Nvidia has agreed to guarantee up to $105bn in conditional lease and power payment obligations, stepping in as the backstop if OpenAI defaults [2].
That is the mechanism, and it is the product news. Landowners, power developers and lenders signing 20-year paper against this campus are not underwriting OpenAI's future revenue; they are underwriting a guarantee from the chip supplier. In exchange Nvidia takes exclusive rights to supply the chips and a $1.5bn direct equity investment in SB Energy [2], and the site runs exclusively on Nvidia hardware [3].
The unit economics of the backstop are worth holding onto. Spread across 8 IT gigawatts, $105bn is roughly $13bn of guaranteed obligation per IT gigawatt [4]; spread across the 20-year term, roughly $5.3bn a year [5]. Those are ceilings on a conditional exposure, not a bill, but they are the scale at which compute is now being underwritten.
The build is phased. The campus launches with 4.25 gigawatts and an option to expand by 3.75 gigawatts [6], which is how you get to the advertised 8 [7]. OpenAI expects initial computing capacity to come online starting in 2028 as the first phase [8]. On the power side, 10 gigawatts serving 8 IT gigawatts implies 1.25 gigawatts delivered per gigawatt of compute [9], supported by a $4bn-plus local energy infrastructure investment from SoftBank and SB Energy [3]. OpenAI and SB Energy have pledged that local residents will not bear any energy or infrastructure costs [10]. OpenAI puts the labour figures at 35,000 construction jobs and 2,500 permanent positions [11].
Critics immediately called the structure circular, on the grounds that supplier, buyer and investor are propping up each other's balance sheets [12]. Nvidia's Jensen Huang rejected that directly: "Is this circular financing? No", stressing that OpenAI remains directly on the hook for rent payments [13]. His stated rationale is that Nvidia is buying long-lived physical sites it can refill with each chip generation, describing the deal as securing long-lived infrastructure so OpenAI can deploy AI factories that are upgraded repeatedly [14]. Read plainly, the guarantee buys Nvidia a two-decade socket at a site it does not have to re-permit.
Context on siting: the campus sits partly on federal land once used for uranium enrichment [15], part of a broader federal effort to convert Cold War nuclear sites into natural gas-backed AI hubs [16]. In July, NextEra Energy and Brookfield disclosed preliminary plans with the Department of Energy for Kentucky's decommissioned Paducah enrichment complex [17]. For scale, the Ohio site follows last year's $500bn Stargate announcement led by OpenAI, Nvidia, SoftBank and Oracle, which targets 10 gigawatts across multiple sites [18], and exceeds Meta's planned 5-gigawatt Louisiana facility by 3 gigawatts on its own [19], as well as SpaceX's 1-gigawatt Colossus network in Tennessee and Mississippi [20].
Three things to watch. First, how the conditions on the $105bn are drawn, since "conditional" is doing all the work in that sentence [2]. Second, whether buyers negotiating 2028 capacity elsewhere now treat a supplier guarantee as standard terms rather than an Nvidia-specific favour. Third, whether the 3.75-gigawatt option is exercised [6], which is the cleanest signal of whether the first 4.25 gigawatts found paying demand.