Skip to content

Product1 publisher3 min readPublished

S2G and the Canada Growth Fund split up to $100 million behind Kanin's waste-heat turbines

Kanin will finance, build and operate the plants itself and sell the power to industrial hosts, against a portfolio of about 50MW already running or under construction. The turbine design is four decades old.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Illustration accompanying S2G and the Canada Growth Fund split up to $100 million behind Kanin's waste-heat turbines

What happened

  • Kanin Energy has raised up to $100 million in new equity to develop, build and operate waste heat-to-power and other on-site power projects across Canada and the US.
  • The commitment splits evenly, with up to $50 million from S2G Investments and another $50 million from the Canada Growth Fund, aimed at oil and gas, cement, steel and metals sites.
  • Kanin's commercial portfolio is about 50MW operating or under construction, including an operating project that supplies electricity to the University of Dayton.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision The question in front of a plant manager stops being whether to buy a turbine and becomes whether to sign a long power contract with a party that will own hardware inside the fence line.
  • cost The host pays through the power price over the term, so the cost falls outside its own capital budget, and the report does not state what that price or term is.
  • constraint Baseload output needs heat that runs continuously, so a batch process with cold gaps gets less out of the same installed capacity than a kiln that never stops.
  • capability A facility stuck behind a grid connection limit gets megawatts that need no new fuel supply and cut what it has to pull from the utility.

The buyer here is a cement, steel or gas plant that already has the heat and no appetite for becoming a project developer. Kanin's offer to that plant is Energy-as-a-Service: the company finances, develops, constructs and operates the project, and the industrial customer uses the resulting power infrastructure without financing it [11][12]. "Kanin was built on the belief that industrial facilities already hold the solution to their own energy challenges, they just need the right partner to execute," said Janice Tran, Kanin's CEO [15].

So the thing being bought is a power contract with a counterparty that will own equipment inside the fence line for years. A plant's finance team will want contract lengths, project capital costs and how many industrial customers Kanin has signed. The report has none of that [20].

Both commitments are written as "up to": up to $50 million from S2G Investments and up to $50 million from the Canada Growth Fund [2]. That makes $100 million a ceiling on the two investors' exposure, not cash sitting in an account [1]. Set the ceiling against a commercial portfolio of about 50MW operating or under construction and it works out to roughly $2 million of equity per megawatt already built or building [9][19]. How many new megawatts that buys depends on how much debt sits alongside the equity.

The turbine is the settled part. Organic Rankine cycle machines have been deployed for more than four decades, using process heat to vaporise an organic working fluid whose vapour drives a turbine and generator [5][6], and nothing is burned to do it [7]. What varies is the host site: how hot the exhaust stream is, how dirty, and whether it runs without stopping. Kanin says its systems are designed to produce baseload electricity supplied directly to industrial facilities or local power buyers [13].

The company's headline number is that as much as 58% of the energy consumed by industrial processes can be lost as waste heat [4]. That is Kanin's own figure, and the "as much as" is a top of range, not a typical plant. It also describes heat leaving the process, not electricity arriving at the switchboard, since a recovery system converts part of that energy [21].

For an operator weighing an offer, two axes decide it. The first is heat continuity, meaning whether the process runs around the clock or in batches with cold gaps, because baseload output needs heat that does not stop [13]. The second is grid position: what power costs at the meter and whether a larger connection can be had at all, which is where on-site generation reduces the volume a facility has to draw [17]. Continuous heat plus expensive or constrained supply is where the economics work. Batch heat plus cheap, available grid power buys a machine that idles whenever the process stops.

"Waste heat has largely been an underused solution, but as these constraints persist, there's a clear and growing incentive to capture it and put it to productive use," said Marisa Sweeney, a principal at S2G [14]. A plant that wants to check the claim before signing has two named references to visit: the operating project supplying electricity to the University of Dayton [8], and the Mewbourn WHP Power Project under development in Weld County, Colorado [10].

What to watch

  • Whether Kanin publishes per-project capital costs or offtake terms as the Mewbourn project in Weld County moves toward construction.
  • How much of the roughly 50MW portfolio moves from under construction to operating, and how fast the pipeline adds to it.
  • Whether the Canada Growth Fund's half is drawn only for Canadian sites while S2G's half funds US projects.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories